President-Elect Trump's cabinet
-
@George-K said in WSJ speculates on Trump's cabinet:
Some of the most powerful figures in Trump’s second term could get loosely defined adviser roles that don’t require Senate confirmation but nonetheless come with proximity and access to the former president.
This is a little bit breathless. But actually such a role doesn't even need to be loosely defined. It doesn't need to be defined in any way. We don't police all social contacts of our presidents, but it sure would have been interesting to do a deep dive into such things during Biden's puppeteered reign*.
*used correctly, for George
-
Pompeo will be in something, fer shur.
He might even pitch Kennedy for HHS. I think McCarthy gets something. Musk definitely heads us the cost-cutting and efficiency brigade. I didn't see Tulsi mentioned, but I think she gets something...Secretary of the Air Force, perhaps?
Whatever happens, he's coming out swinging.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
Pompeo will be in something, fer shur.
He might even pitch Kennedy for HHS. I think McCarthy gets something. Musk definitely heads us the cost-cutting and efficiency brigade. I didn't see Tulsi mentioned, but I think she gets something...Secretary of the Air Force, perhaps?
Whatever happens, he's coming out swinging.
@Jolly said in WSJ speculates on Trump's cabinet:
Pompeo will be in something, fer shur.
I've read skepticism about Pompeo - too swampy.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@Horace said in WSJ speculates on Trump's cabinet:
Tucker makes fun of Pompeo for being a Trump scrotum licker.
Presumably he can see him doing that from his own dark, dank position.
-
@Jolly said in WSJ speculates on Trump's cabinet:
Pompeo will be in something, fer shur.
I've read skepticism about Pompeo - too swampy.
@George-K said in WSJ speculates on Trump's cabinet:
@Jolly said in WSJ speculates on Trump's cabinet:
Pompeo will be in something, fer shur.
I've read skepticism about Pompeo - too swampy.
Trump values loyalty. Trump also talked with Rogan about mistakes he made, selecting too many people in his first administration he didn't really know or selecting people that did not understand how the levers of power are used in Washington.
-
First pick - Wiles, Chief of Staff.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
Linda McMahon, the co-chair of Trump’s transition team and his former Small Business Administration chief, is considered by some of the former president’s allies to be a leading contender for the job.
I am still astounded that two personalities from WWE will be leading this nation…
-
I don’t think as Chief of Staff she needs to
know anything about Russia other than where it is on a world map. Managing the President’s work day schedule and the WH staff though she ought to know everything possible to keep things running as smoothly as can be under all conditions and circumstances.Elbows up!
-
I didn’t see them speculate on Education… Which leads to further speculation on my part…
-
I don’t think as Chief of Staff she needs to
know anything about Russia other than where it is on a world map. Managing the President’s work day schedule and the WH staff though she ought to know everything possible to keep things running as smoothly as can be under all conditions and circumstances.@Renauda said in WSJ speculates on Trump's cabinet:
I don’t think as Chief of Staff she needs to
know anything about Russia other than where it is on a world map. Managing the President’s work day schedule and the WH staff though she ought to know everything possible to keep things running as smoothly as can be under all conditions and circumstances.I first read jolly’s post as an answer to Wim’s but I realize he was just posting news.
