Worse?
-
Waiting for the obligatory whattaboutism deflection.
-
-
My question would be: How do we know that what was claimed to be the original answer was really that? The camera switched over, so it was possible PJ Media inserted an answer. LOL
Also, this comment from the article:
This was a nonsensical word salad that didn't make much sense.
LOL. Who are we talking about?
-
@taiwan_girl said in Worse?:
My question would be: How do we know that what was claimed to be the original answer was really that? The camera switched over, so it was possible PJ Media inserted an answer. LOL
How it works is, they made a claim and then supported it with evidence. If you are now making a claim about their evidence, you need to provide evidence of your own or what you're doing is creating conspiracy theories.
Also, this comment from the article:
This was a nonsensical word salad that didn't make much sense.
LOL. Who are we talking about?
There it is. Thanks for not disappointing.
-
And when the interviewer is hostile, the conditions of the interview must include your right to record audio and video on your own device, so that if an edit is done, you have proof of it.
They figured out she is a nitwit and they fixed it.
That's how she went from an approval rating of 28% (or so) to about 50% overnight. CBS carried so much water, and oil tanker wouldn't be big enough...
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Worse?:
There it is. Thanks for not disappointing.
I actually did that on purpose. LOL
@George-K That is funny. Unfortunately, with how easy it is to edit today, everything is going to be questioned.
