For all pedantry
-
Historically inaccurate. Hangman does not refer to the executed but to the executioner. As these executioners were universally male, “Hangman” is the correct title.
-
Historically inaccurate. Hangman does not refer to the executed but to the executioner. As these executioners were universally male, “Hangman” is the correct title.
@LuFins-Dad said in For all pedantry:
Historically inaccurate. Hangman does not refer to the executed but to the executioner. As these executioners were universally male, “Hangman” is the correct title.
Wrong once again.
I was only joking
-
@Mik said in For all pedantry:
Boy, did I name this thread right.
I think it would have been better named as 'For all pedants'
-
@LuFins-Dad said in For all pedantry:
Historically inaccurate. Hangman does not refer to the executed but to the executioner. As these executioners were universally male, “Hangman” is the correct title.
Wrong once again.
@Doctor-Phibes said in For all pedantry:
@LuFins-Dad said in For all pedantry:
Historically inaccurate. Hangman does not refer to the executed but to the executioner. As these executioners were universally male, “Hangman” is the correct title.
Wrong once again.
Don’t assume their gender.
