Mar-a-Lago raided
-
Interview & profile of a Trump employee who unknowingly got mixed up in the Trump classified documents case.
-
I assume that's boilerplate. I'm not clear how it changes an FBI officer's decisions, to have been told they are "authorized to use deadly force when necessary". I mean any LEO is authorized to use deadly force when necessary. Otherwise, they wouldn't give them guns.
-
As I said. The right wing media is running with this nothing burger. I got an email about it from some list I never intentionally subscribed to.
-
It's not a nothing burger.
It's a former fucking President of the United States. Period.
I'd like to know...Was deadly force authorized when Biden's home was searched?
-
It's not a nothing burger.
It's a former fucking President of the United States. Period.
I'd like to know...Was deadly force authorized when Biden's home was searched?
@Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
It's not a nothing burger.
It's a former fucking President of the United States. Period.
According to Shipley, former fed prosecutor, now defending ~50 Jan 6 defendants, it's SOP.
I'd like to know...Was deadly force authorized when Biden's home was searched?
Good question. I don't even know if there was a warrant.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
Reminds me of this piece I came across recently.
-
Recent Unsealed judge document about the raid:
“Two months after the former president yielded 38 unique classified documents to the government on June 3, 2022, the government discovered over 100 additional classified documents stored in Mar-a-Lago during execution of the August 8, 2022 search warrant that the former president had failed to deliver,” the opinion stated.
“The documents were classified to levels as high as TOP SECRET, with some documents bearing additional sensitive compartment indications; undoubtedly, these documents contained national defense information.”
“More classified-marked documents still were uncovered in November 2022 in a leased storage unit, in December 2022 in the Office at Mar-a-Lago, and apparently sometime thereafter in the former president’s own bedroom at Mar-a-Lago.”
Whole document here:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.561.4.pdf -
@Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
It's not a nothing burger.
It's a former fucking President of the United States. Period.
According to Shipley, former fed prosecutor, now defending ~50 Jan 6 defendants, it's SOP.
I'd like to know...Was deadly force authorized when Biden's home was searched?
Good question. I don't even know if there was a warrant.
@George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
It's not a nothing burger.
It's a former fucking President of the United States. Period.
According to Shipley, former fed prosecutor, now defending ~50 Jan 6 defendants, it's SOP.
I'd like to know...Was deadly force authorized when Biden's home was searched?
Good question. I don't even know if there was a warrant.
@George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
@Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:
It's not a nothing burger.
It's a former fucking President of the United States. Period.
According to Shipley, former fed prosecutor, now defending ~50 Jan 6 defendants, it's SOP.
I'd like to know...Was deadly force authorized when Biden's home was searched?
Good question. I don't even know if there was a warrant.
Probably not, unlike the fat man he was cooperating.
-
McCarthy:
All search warrants involve the possibility of forced entry. All of them involve police seizures of property, which can subject the personnel involved to legal risks as well as safety risks. The cops or federal agents usually do a good job of identifying themselves during the process of seeking or forcing entry; yet there are tragic instances in which people inside the premises mistakenly believe violent criminals, rather than cops, are trying to get in, resulting in physical confrontations including, sometimes, exchanges of gunfire.
As a result, and as a matter of common sense, the FBI always has an operational plan for carrying out a court-authorized search. That plan customarily involves reminding the search teams of the FBI’s use-of-force policies. Those policies, of course, include a refresher on the conditions under which lethal force may be used. This is to prepare law-enforcement officials for contingencies that are all too familiar, and to protect the agency and agents in the event of later legal claims.
If you don’t instantly grasp why police agencies would perform these prudential steps, you must have been living under a rock for the last decade or so, which has featured no shortage of instances in which allegations of excessive police force have been made (and a thankfully small percentage of instances when excessive force was actually used), with intense scrutiny and occasional rioting in the aftermath.
It would have been surprising if the Mar-a-Lago search hadn’t been conducted in accordance with an operational plan of which use-of-force policies were a component. It was important to do this search by the book — more on that momentarily. But there was never anticipation that force, much less lethal force, would be used, and there was never any threat to the former president. My understanding is that the FBI was reluctant to do the search — it was Justice Department officials who ran out of patience with Trump’s intransigence. The bureau intentionally carried out the search when it was known that Trump was not on the premises.
