Plagiarism at UCLA Medical School
-
Kinda looks like many of our eggheads are buying their doctorates.
-
@Jolly said in Plagiarism at UCLA Medical School:
Kinda looks like many of our eggheads are buying their doctorates.
Read the thread about Columbia's president.
- She copied figures and texts from the second author.
- She deleted his name on the paper
- This is the ONLY publication that's been cited more than 200 times. Her other writings have been cited, but not often.
President of Columbia.
-
@Jolly said in Plagiarism at UCLA Medical School:
Kinda looks like many of our eggheads are buying their doctorates.
Read the thread about Columbia's president.
- She copied figures and texts from the second author.
- She deleted his name on the paper
- This is the ONLY publication that's been cited more than 200 times. Her other writings have been cited, but not often.
President of Columbia.
@George-K said in Plagiarism at UCLA Medical School:
@Jolly said in Plagiarism at UCLA Medical School:
Kinda looks like many of our eggheads are buying their doctorates.
Read the thread about Columbia's president.
- She copied figures and texts from the second author.
- She deleted his name on the paper
- This is the ONLY publication that's been cited more than 200 times. Her other writings have been cited, but not often.
President of Columbia.
If she was born to wealth, it would be the icing on the cake.
<looks it up>
Sure enough. Born to wealthy parents. She is the oppressed face worn by high status western institutions.
-
@George-K
” What the AF is "radical listening?"
I’m picturing an aging lesbian tenured academic, drunk (again) after a bottle of wine, shouting at her grad students doing the mandatory qualitative research methodologies course because she’s forgotten to wear her hearing aide (again). …That was a semester I’ll never forget. -
That one doesn’t seem so clear to me. It’s her own paper. And surely she cites it.
I’m pretty close to someone who was in the search committee that resulted in her hiring, and holds a leadership role that would have her on all the conference calls about how to deal with everything that’s going on. I can’t wait to talk to her.
Last time we spoke about Columbia she was grateful that the president wasn’t at the hearing with the Penn, MIT, and Harvard presidents. The only reason she wasn’t was a scheduling issue. She actually thought they had dodged that bullet.
-
That one doesn’t seem so clear to me. It’s her own paper. And surely she cites it.
I’m pretty close to someone who was in the search committee that resulted in her hiring, and holds a leadership role that would have her on all the conference calls about how to deal with everything that’s going on. I can’t wait to talk to her.
Last time we spoke about Columbia she was grateful that the president wasn’t at the hearing with the Penn, MIT, and Harvard presidents. The only reason she wasn’t was a scheduling issue. She actually thought they had dodged that bullet.
@jon-nyc said in Plagiarism at UCLA Medical School:
It’s her own paper. And surely she cites it.
It's her own and another author's paper.
In the thread, someone comments that the paper which had two authors was a "working" paper and the second author was not included in the "final" version.
OTOH are a 'working paper' and 'final paper' commonly two years apart?
I can't access the references in the single-authored paper to see if the second author is cited.
-
I’d like to see the cite. If you cite ‘GeorgeK et al’ in a footnote there’s no need to mention all the co-authors names in the text.
-
I’d like to see the cite. If you cite ‘GeorgeK et al’ in a footnote there’s no need to mention all the co-authors names in the text.
-
So this is a thing now? An academic pisses you off, let’s run their published papers through a plagiarism filter?
