Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Alec Baldwin Charged

Alec Baldwin Charged

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
112 Posts 12 Posters 2.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/rust-armorer-fair-shot-trial-1235823841/

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #41

      I'm watching Guiterrez-Reed's trial.

      It's at the end of the first week, and the state still hasn't rested. The testimony against her, and, for that matter, so many people on the set is damning. It's amazing to hear how unprofessional her behavior was.

      An experienced armorer talks about firearm safety on set and finds a TON of potentially dangerous situations:

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #42

        Saw a lawyer talking about the charges and discussing the defense's motion to drop charges.

        He says the state's responsibilities are to prove, beyond the reasonable doubt, the following things:

        1. Alec Baldwin pointed the muzzle of what he knew to be a real gun at Hutchins.
        2. Alec Baldwin pressed the trigger in a manner to fire the gun with the hammer cocked.
        3. Baldwin failed to check that there was no live ammunition in the gun.
        4. The unintended discharge of the firearm killed Hutchins.

        That's it.

        According to New Mexico law "I didn't know it was loaded" is not a defense, and it's been adjudicated in the past in New Mexico's Supreme Court. Court said it made no difference as to who loaded the gun.

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Online
          HoraceH Online
          Horace
          wrote on last edited by
          #43

          If you get unlucky and accidentally kill someone in an extraordinary circumstance, and there exists prosecutor motivation to convict you of a substantial crime, then they can probably file some charges and craft some jury instructions around those charges such that you're going to prison.

          Education is extremely important.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #44

            Law based on emotion or a driving need to find somebody "guilty" is bad law.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #45

              Gutierrez-Reed gets 18 months (the maximum) for involuntary manslaughter.

              This is bad for Baldwin.

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #46

                be2b9fe4-fa95-4647-90ac-8b496cd78922.jpeg

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #47

                  Nothing died during the posting of this Tweet, although the English language sure took a bit of a beating.

                  I was only joking

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG Offline
                    George KG Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #48

                    It's more than just 18 months.

                    The judge had the option to jail her for 12 months in a jail, not prison, and no felony on her record. She didn't do that, the judge gave her the (surprisingly short) maximum sentence of 18 months - in prison.

                    Also, she is classified as a "violent offender." That means that, in New Mexico, she has to serve 85% of the sentence - even with time off for good behavior. So, at least 15 months, 1 week.

                    The judge looked pissed.

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                    • HoraceH Online
                      HoraceH Online
                      Horace
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #49

                      I wonder if the judge felt more feels about her behavior than the feels she feels about more common violent offenses like rape and murder.

                      Education is extremely important.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins Dad
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #50

                        What are the charges Baldwin faces? His role as producer plays a part in this in addition to being the guy that actually pulled the trigger. If the actions of the armorer were that blatantly dangerous? Then he bears responsibility for allowing that culture on his set.

                        The Brad

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • George KG George K

                          It's more than just 18 months.

                          The judge had the option to jail her for 12 months in a jail, not prison, and no felony on her record. She didn't do that, the judge gave her the (surprisingly short) maximum sentence of 18 months - in prison.

                          Also, she is classified as a "violent offender." That means that, in New Mexico, she has to serve 85% of the sentence - even with time off for good behavior. So, at least 15 months, 1 week.

                          The judge looked pissed.

                          RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #51

                          @George-K

                          The judge looked pissed.

                          At what? The crime? The professional negligence that resulted in a death? Or the attitude that went along with the negligence?

                          I don’t know as I haven’t followed the trial.

                          Elbows up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • MikM Away
                            MikM Away
                            Mik
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #52

                            Well, it's kind of a 'you had ONE JOB' scenario. That she would even have allowed live ammunition on a movie set is pretty unbelievable.

                            “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                            George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                            • MikM Mik

                              Well, it's kind of a 'you had ONE JOB' scenario. That she would even have allowed live ammunition on a movie set is pretty unbelievable.

                              George KG Offline
                              George KG Offline
                              George K
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #53

                              @Mik said in Alec Baldwin Charged:

                              Well, it's kind of a 'you had ONE JOB' scenario.

                              Actually, she had two jobs - she was also on the crew that took care of props other than firearms. One of her arguments (faulty as it was) is that there was too much pressure to do everything properly and safely.

                              That she would even have allowed live ammunition on a movie set is pretty unbelievable.

                              Still unanswered is how that happened. She claims to have been unaware, though there are multiple reports of cast and crew enjoying "extracurricular" shooting with live ammo. But, you're right it was her job to make sure the gun was safe. She was not on set when the gun was handed to Baldwin. Someone else did that (a woman named "Zachary," iirc) who ended up testifying for the state.

                              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                              LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                              • RenaudaR Offline
                                RenaudaR Offline
                                Renauda
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #54

                                @Mik

                                Yes, I can see that, she had one job. The negligence leading to the shooting is reprehensible as it is unacceptable.

                                Elbows up!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • George KG Offline
                                  George KG Offline
                                  George K
                                  wrote on last edited by George K
                                  #55

                                  The judge. "You were the armorer. You alone are responsible for turning a safe weapon into a lethal weapon. But for you, a husband would have his wife, and a little boy his mother."

                                  Note, this is the same prosecutor who is teeing up the Baldwin case.

                                  And that will be before the same judge.

                                  ETA: Go to 2:07.

                                  Link to video

                                  "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                  The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • RenaudaR Offline
                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    Renauda
                                    wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                    #56

                                    I would say the judge is doing her job in accordance to the responsibilities her job entails and bestows upon her.

                                    Elbows up!

                                    George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • RenaudaR Renauda

                                      I would say the judge is doing her job in accordance to the responsibilities her job entails and bestows upon her.

                                      George KG Offline
                                      George KG Offline
                                      George K
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #57

                                      @Renauda said in Alec Baldwin Charged:

                                      I would say the judge is doing her job in accordance to the responsibilities her job entails and bestows upon her.

                                      I watched most of the trial, or at least the nightly summaries.

                                      1. Gutierrez's attorney was a doofus. He was incompetent and unengaged. The witnesses he called were worse than useless - they damage her case. During the police interview prior to trial he sat like a turd, and NEVER intervened ("Don't answer that").

                                      2. The DA, Morrissey, was really excellent. She's a barracuda with a keen mind and never, ever, lets go. She used to be a public defender, and she knows the ropes.

                                      3. The judge was a hard-ass.

                                      Like I said, the judge and the DA will be there in July for Baldwin.

                                      My opinion? He's guilty as well.

                                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • George KG George K

                                        @Mik said in Alec Baldwin Charged:

                                        Well, it's kind of a 'you had ONE JOB' scenario.

                                        Actually, she had two jobs - she was also on the crew that took care of props other than firearms. One of her arguments (faulty as it was) is that there was too much pressure to do everything properly and safely.

                                        That she would even have allowed live ammunition on a movie set is pretty unbelievable.

                                        Still unanswered is how that happened. She claims to have been unaware, though there are multiple reports of cast and crew enjoying "extracurricular" shooting with live ammo. But, you're right it was her job to make sure the gun was safe. She was not on set when the gun was handed to Baldwin. Someone else did that (a woman named "Zachary," iirc) who ended up testifying for the state.

                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins Dad
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #58

                                        @George-K said in Alec Baldwin Charged:

                                        @Mik said in Alec Baldwin Charged:

                                        Well, it's kind of a 'you had ONE JOB' scenario.

                                        Actually, she had two jobs - she was also on the crew that took care of props other than firearms. One of her arguments (faulty as it was) is that there was too much pressure to do everything properly and safely.

                                        That she would even have allowed live ammunition on a movie set is pretty unbelievable.

                                        Still unanswered is how that happened. She claims to have been unaware, though there are multiple reports of cast and crew enjoying "extracurricular" shooting with live ammo. But, you're right it was her job to make sure the gun was safe. She was not on set when the gun was handed to Baldwin. Someone else did that (a woman named "Zachary," iirc) who ended up testifying for the state.

                                        Whoa, wait, she wasn’t even on set the day the shooting happened? And she was found guilty? Oh shit, that makes it worse for Baldwin…

                                        The Brad

                                        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • George KG George K

                                          The judge. "You were the armorer. You alone are responsible for turning a safe weapon into a lethal weapon. But for you, a husband would have his wife, and a little boy his mother."

                                          Note, this is the same prosecutor who is teeing up the Baldwin case.

                                          And that will be before the same judge.

                                          ETA: Go to 2:07.

                                          Link to video

                                          LuFins DadL Offline
                                          LuFins DadL Offline
                                          LuFins Dad
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #59

                                          @George-K said in Alec Baldwin Charged:

                                          The judge. "You were the armorer. You alone are responsible for turning a safe weapon into a lethal weapon. But for you, a husband would have his wife, and a little boy his mother."

                                          Note, this is the same prosecutor who is teeing up the Baldwin case.

                                          And that will be before the same judge.

                                          ETA: Go to 2:07.

                                          Link to video

                                          Again, I think it goes worse for him as the producer than it would if he was just the actor.

                                          The Brad

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups