Hannity Offers
-
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
So why do the pro-Russia propoganda bullshit? Because that's what it looked like to me. The idea that he didn't realise that $107 is worth considerably more money in Russia than it is in the US is hard to swallow unless you believe that he's an imbecile.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
So why do the pro-Russia propoganda bullshit? Because that's what it looked like to me. The idea that he didn't realise that $107 is worth considerably more money in Russia than it is in the US is hard to swallow unless you believe that he's an imbecile.
“Pro-Russian propaganda bullshit” and “imbecile” are not mutually exclusive.
-
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
So Tucker has calculated, as the cynical grifter that he is, that his audience wants to be told that Russia is better than America. Interesting perspective.
No, that's not what I think, but this isn't really about what I think, it's about why Tucker did what he did.
You tell me, why do you think he was being so pro Russia in his creepy Putin show?
You're the one who once said that 'Tucker was good people'.
And that means I support everything he says. Yes I know how this goes.
What was his intent in that show?
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
And so you think that Putin actually gave his perspective and didn't use the interview as a potential manipulation platform?
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
So Tucker has calculated, as the cynical grifter that he is, that his audience wants to be told that Russia is better than America. Interesting perspective.
No, that's not what I think, but this isn't really about what I think, it's about why Tucker did what he did.
You tell me, why do you think he was being so pro Russia in his creepy Putin show?
You're the one who once said that 'Tucker was good people'.
And that means I support everything he says. Yes I know how this goes.
What was his intent in that show?
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
And so you think that Putin actually gave his perspective and didn't use the interview as a potential manipulation platform?
Of course all leaders do that. I don't think there is such a thing as a world leader who should never be interviewed.
Education is extremely important.
-
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
So why do the pro-Russia propoganda bullshit? Because that's what it looked like to me. The idea that he didn't realise that $107 is worth considerably more money in Russia than it is in the US is hard to swallow unless you believe that he's an imbecile.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
So why do the pro-Russia propoganda bullshit? Because that's what it looked like to me. The idea that he didn't realise that $107 is worth considerably more money in Russia than it is in the US is hard to swallow unless you believe that he's an imbecile.
I think it was a throwaway comment, a stupid one, from what you've told me about it. His intent was to say something nice about Russia, probably to offset what he sees as an imbalanced negativity in America. This is a completely common rhetorical device. There's probably someone saying something nice about Gaza in a mainstream news outlet as we speak, because they feel it's important to do so. That doesn't mean they're in love with Gaza.
Education is extremely important.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
So Tucker has calculated, as the cynical grifter that he is, that his audience wants to be told that Russia is better than America. Interesting perspective.
No, that's not what I think, but this isn't really about what I think, it's about why Tucker did what he did.
You tell me, why do you think he was being so pro Russia in his creepy Putin show?
You're the one who once said that 'Tucker was good people'.
And that means I support everything he says. Yes I know how this goes.
What was his intent in that show?
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
And so you think that Putin actually gave his perspective and didn't use the interview as a potential manipulation platform?
Of course all leaders do that. I don't think there is such a thing as a world leader who should never be interviewed.
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
So Tucker has calculated, as the cynical grifter that he is, that his audience wants to be told that Russia is better than America. Interesting perspective.
No, that's not what I think, but this isn't really about what I think, it's about why Tucker did what he did.
You tell me, why do you think he was being so pro Russia in his creepy Putin show?
You're the one who once said that 'Tucker was good people'.
And that means I support everything he says. Yes I know how this goes.
What was his intent in that show?
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
And so you think that Putin actually gave his perspective and didn't use the interview as a potential manipulation platform?
Of course all leaders do that. I don't think there is such a thing as a world leader who should never be interviewed.
So you think Putin's just another world leader and not a war criminal who has it out for the U.S.?
-
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
So Tucker has calculated, as the cynical grifter that he is, that his audience wants to be told that Russia is better than America. Interesting perspective.
No, that's not what I think, but this isn't really about what I think, it's about why Tucker did what he did.
You tell me, why do you think he was being so pro Russia in his creepy Putin show?
You're the one who once said that 'Tucker was good people'.
And that means I support everything he says. Yes I know how this goes.
What was his intent in that show?
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
And so you think that Putin actually gave his perspective and didn't use the interview as a potential manipulation platform?
Of course all leaders do that. I don't think there is such a thing as a world leader who should never be interviewed.
So you think Putin's just another world leader and not a war criminal who has it out for the U.S.?
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
So Tucker has calculated, as the cynical grifter that he is, that his audience wants to be told that Russia is better than America. Interesting perspective.
No, that's not what I think, but this isn't really about what I think, it's about why Tucker did what he did.
You tell me, why do you think he was being so pro Russia in his creepy Putin show?
You're the one who once said that 'Tucker was good people'.
And that means I support everything he says. Yes I know how this goes.
What was his intent in that show?
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
And so you think that Putin actually gave his perspective and didn't use the interview as a potential manipulation platform?
Of course all leaders do that. I don't think there is such a thing as a world leader who should never be interviewed.
So you think Putin's just another world leader and not a war criminal who has it out for the U.S.?
I am ok with a war criminal who has it out for the US being interviewed.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
So Tucker has calculated, as the cynical grifter that he is, that his audience wants to be told that Russia is better than America. Interesting perspective.
No, that's not what I think, but this isn't really about what I think, it's about why Tucker did what he did.
You tell me, why do you think he was being so pro Russia in his creepy Putin show?
You're the one who once said that 'Tucker was good people'.
And that means I support everything he says. Yes I know how this goes.
What was his intent in that show?
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
And so you think that Putin actually gave his perspective and didn't use the interview as a potential manipulation platform?
Of course all leaders do that. I don't think there is such a thing as a world leader who should never be interviewed.
So you think Putin's just another world leader and not a war criminal who has it out for the U.S.?
I am ok with a war criminal who has it out for the US being interviewed.
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
So Tucker has calculated, as the cynical grifter that he is, that his audience wants to be told that Russia is better than America. Interesting perspective.
No, that's not what I think, but this isn't really about what I think, it's about why Tucker did what he did.
You tell me, why do you think he was being so pro Russia in his creepy Putin show?
You're the one who once said that 'Tucker was good people'.
And that means I support everything he says. Yes I know how this goes.
What was his intent in that show?
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
And so you think that Putin actually gave his perspective and didn't use the interview as a potential manipulation platform?
Of course all leaders do that. I don't think there is such a thing as a world leader who should never be interviewed.
So you think Putin's just another world leader and not a war criminal who has it out for the U.S.?
I am ok with a war criminal who has it out for the US being interviewed.
I'm not because the interviewer, as Phibes described, was trying to paint a ludicrous picture.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I would think his main intent was to give insight into Putin's perspective. His opposition to the US's current level of support of Ukraine is obviously a factor.
So why do the pro-Russia propoganda bullshit? Because that's what it looked like to me. The idea that he didn't realise that $107 is worth considerably more money in Russia than it is in the US is hard to swallow unless you believe that he's an imbecile.
I think it was a throwaway comment, a stupid one, from what you've told me about it. His intent was to say something nice about Russia, probably to offset what he sees as an imbalanced negativity in America. This is a completely common rhetorical device. There's probably someone saying something nice about Gaza in a mainstream news outlet as we speak, because they feel it's important to do so. That doesn't mean they're in love with Gaza.
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I think it was a throwaway comment, a stupid one, from what you've told me about it. His intent was to say something nice about Russia, probably to offset what he sees as an imbalanced negativity in America.
He actually said it radicalized him against the American leadership. That isn't saying something nice about Russia, it's saying something bad about America.
I don't believe for an instant that it was a throwaway remark.
Radicalized? Assuming he doesn't mean he was penetrated by a root vegetable during the interview, that's a pretty strong word for a throwaway remark.
-
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I think it was a throwaway comment, a stupid one, from what you've told me about it. His intent was to say something nice about Russia, probably to offset what he sees as an imbalanced negativity in America.
He actually said it radicalized him against the American leadership. That isn't saying something nice about Russia, it's saying something bad about America.
I don't believe for an instant that it was a throwaway remark.
Radicalized? Assuming he doesn't mean he was penetrated by a root vegetable during the interview, that's a pretty strong word for a throwaway remark.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I think it was a throwaway comment, a stupid one, from what you've told me about it. His intent was to say something nice about Russia, probably to offset what he sees as an imbalanced negativity in America.
He actually said it radicalized him against the American leadership. That isn't saying something nice about Russia, it's saying something bad about America.
I don't believe for an instant that it was a throwaway remark.
Radicalized? Assuming he doesn't mean he was penetrated by a root vegetable during the interview, that's a pretty strong word for a throwaway remark.
I did listen to a long form interview with him after he got back from Russia, and he did not strike me as radicalized, and the word was not used. I am comfortable that it was a throwaway remark. It presents an easy target for sneering / giggling at him, but I don't buy that anybody is really disquieted by him saying that.
Education is extremely important.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I think it was a throwaway comment, a stupid one, from what you've told me about it. His intent was to say something nice about Russia, probably to offset what he sees as an imbalanced negativity in America.
He actually said it radicalized him against the American leadership. That isn't saying something nice about Russia, it's saying something bad about America.
I don't believe for an instant that it was a throwaway remark.
Radicalized? Assuming he doesn't mean he was penetrated by a root vegetable during the interview, that's a pretty strong word for a throwaway remark.
I did listen to a long form interview with him after he got back from Russia, and he did not strike me as radicalized, and the word was not used. I am comfortable that it was a throwaway remark. It presents an easy target for sneering / giggling at him, but I don't buy that anybody is really disquieted by him saying that.
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I think it was a throwaway comment, a stupid one, from what you've told me about it. His intent was to say something nice about Russia, probably to offset what he sees as an imbalanced negativity in America.
He actually said it radicalized him against the American leadership. That isn't saying something nice about Russia, it's saying something bad about America.
I don't believe for an instant that it was a throwaway remark.
Radicalized? Assuming he doesn't mean he was penetrated by a root vegetable during the interview, that's a pretty strong word for a throwaway remark.
I did listen to a long form interview with him after he got back from Russia, and he did not strike me as radicalized, and the word was not used. I am comfortable that it was a throwaway remark. It presents an easy target for sneering / giggling at him, but I don't buy that anybody is really disquieted by him saying that.
Not sure you see it's possible for anyone to (a) not like Tucker Carlson and (b) not be a giggling woke.
Please love yourself.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
As far as Tucker is concerned, the phrase much loved by conservatives during the cold war, to wit - "If you like Russia so much, why don't you go and fucking live there?", springs to mind.
He's very clear in the interview I listened to recently that he thinks Russia is garbage compared to the US overall. He's particularly fond of the free speech one is granted in America.
He's very clear in the interview I listened to recently that he thinks Russia is garbage compared to the US overall.
Is that the Lex Fridman interview?
If it is, I saw the first half hour or so of it. Amusing that FuCa spinning as to how and why he fucked up the interview. He couldn’t fathom why even Putin was less than impressed.
Lex was great though - just slowly letting out line then reeling that FuCa back in like a fish. Still have two and half hours of it to watch.
FuCa is such an ass.
Elbows up!
-
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I think it was a throwaway comment, a stupid one, from what you've told me about it. His intent was to say something nice about Russia, probably to offset what he sees as an imbalanced negativity in America.
He actually said it radicalized him against the American leadership. That isn't saying something nice about Russia, it's saying something bad about America.
I don't believe for an instant that it was a throwaway remark.
Radicalized? Assuming he doesn't mean he was penetrated by a root vegetable during the interview, that's a pretty strong word for a throwaway remark.
I did listen to a long form interview with him after he got back from Russia, and he did not strike me as radicalized, and the word was not used. I am comfortable that it was a throwaway remark. It presents an easy target for sneering / giggling at him, but I don't buy that anybody is really disquieted by him saying that.
Not sure you see it's possible for anyone to (a) not like Tucker Carlson and (b) not be a giggling woke.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I think it was a throwaway comment, a stupid one, from what you've told me about it. His intent was to say something nice about Russia, probably to offset what he sees as an imbalanced negativity in America.
He actually said it radicalized him against the American leadership. That isn't saying something nice about Russia, it's saying something bad about America.
I don't believe for an instant that it was a throwaway remark.
Radicalized? Assuming he doesn't mean he was penetrated by a root vegetable during the interview, that's a pretty strong word for a throwaway remark.
I did listen to a long form interview with him after he got back from Russia, and he did not strike me as radicalized, and the word was not used. I am comfortable that it was a throwaway remark. It presents an easy target for sneering / giggling at him, but I don't buy that anybody is really disquieted by him saying that.
Not sure you see it's possible for anyone to (a) not like Tucker Carlson and (b) not be a giggling woke.
I guess that would make me an imbecile, since there are lots of people here who don't like him and obviously aren't giggling woke.
-
He's very clear in the interview I listened to recently that he thinks Russia is garbage compared to the US overall.
Is that the Lex Fridman interview?
If it is, I saw the first half hour or so of it. Amusing that FuCa spinning as to how and why he fucked up the interview. He couldn’t fathom why even Putin was less than impressed.
Lex was great though - just slowly letting out line then reeling that FuCa back in like a fish. Still have two and half hours of it to watch.
FuCa is such an ass.
@Renauda said in Hannity Offers:
He's very clear in the interview I listened to recently that he thinks Russia is garbage compared to the US overall.
Is that the Lex Fridman interview?
yes, it's on youtube for anybody to listen to. Tucker's laugh will drive many off, and I can understand that.
-
It’s not just his laugh that drives me off.
I don't think there is such a thing as a world leader who should never be interviewed.
I agree such is important and it is good that Putin granted an
audienceinterview. Just not to FuCa because he didn’t know what to do with it other than look like a deer in the headlights.Ought to have been a real journalist like Stephen Sackur or Douglas Murray.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I think it was a throwaway comment, a stupid one, from what you've told me about it. His intent was to say something nice about Russia, probably to offset what he sees as an imbalanced negativity in America.
He actually said it radicalized him against the American leadership. That isn't saying something nice about Russia, it's saying something bad about America.
I don't believe for an instant that it was a throwaway remark.
Radicalized? Assuming he doesn't mean he was penetrated by a root vegetable during the interview, that's a pretty strong word for a throwaway remark.
I did listen to a long form interview with him after he got back from Russia, and he did not strike me as radicalized, and the word was not used. I am comfortable that it was a throwaway remark. It presents an easy target for sneering / giggling at him, but I don't buy that anybody is really disquieted by him saying that.
@Horace said in Hannity Offers:
I did listen to a long form interview with him after he got back from Russia, and he did not strike me as radicalized, and the word was not used. I am comfortable that it was a throwaway remark. It presents an easy target for sneering / giggling at him, but I don't buy that anybody is really disquieted by him saying that.
I'm not giggling or sneering. I think he's an abject cunt.
-
Whether you like the interview or not, has anybody else from America done an interview with Putin?
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
Whether you like the interview or not, has anybody else from America done an interview with Putin?
@Jolly said in Hannity Offers:
Whether you like the interview or not, has anybody else from America done an interview with Putin?
Yes, the leftist and, like that FuCa, a notorious conspiracy theorist promoter, Oliver Stone in 2017.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Putin_Interviews
So what’s your point?
Elbows up!
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
They’re unlike the deeply principled patriot that is Tucker Carlson, then.
At least Carlson is consistent. I always have to ask whether Stewart is wearing his clown nose when he says something reasonable.
@George-K said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
They’re unlike the deeply principled patriot that is Tucker Carlson, then.
At least Carlson is consistent.
We know otherwise since the dominion trial. Horace was describing Stewart, but what he said is certainly true of Tucker as well.
-
@George-K said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
They’re unlike the deeply principled patriot that is Tucker Carlson, then.
At least Carlson is consistent.
We know otherwise since the dominion trial. Horace was describing Stewart, but what he said is certainly true of Tucker as well.
@jon-nyc said in Hannity Offers:
@George-K said in Hannity Offers:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Hannity Offers:
They’re unlike the deeply principled patriot that is Tucker Carlson, then.
At least Carlson is consistent.
We know otherwise since the dominion trial. Horace was describing Stewart, but what he said is certainly true of Tucker as well.
Tucker mentioned the texts calling Trump all those bad names. Those were situational, in response to Trump being unable to provide any evidence for the strong claims he was making about election theft, and which Tucker had been credulously reporting.
-
@Jolly said in Hannity Offers:
Whether you like the interview or not, has anybody else from America done an interview with Putin?
Yes, the leftist and, like that FuCa, a notorious conspiracy theorist promoter, Oliver Stone in 2017.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Putin_Interviews
So what’s your point?
@Renauda said in Hannity Offers:
@Jolly said in Hannity Offers:
Whether you like the interview or not, has anybody else from America done an interview with Putin?
Yes, the leftist and, like that FuCa, a notorious conspiracy theorist promoter, Oliver Stone in 2017.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Putin_Interviews
So what’s your point?
Uh, that's pre-war, correct?
