Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Chess geek stuff

Chess geek stuff

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
7 Posts 4 Posters 81 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Somebody analyzed chess ratings over the years - in case you don't know, there's a formula for calculating a chess players playing strength using his results, giving him an ELO rating.

    What is kind of surprising, to me at least, is that since it was introduced in 1970, there have only been 6 players who were clear world number 1. I don't think you could say the same about any other sporting activity. Starting with Bobby Fischer, then Karpov, Kasparov, Topalov, Anand and currently Magnus Carlsen.

    https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-glorious-55-top-five-players-since-the-introduction-of-the-elo-list

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Interesting article, but kind of a weird writing style.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I'm curious how far the champions fall as they age. I'm guessing not that much.

        For example, how many people on the planet today could consistently beat Kasparov? I'd guess it's a small number. Maybe single digits or low double.

        Thank you for your attention to this matter.

        Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          I'm curious how far the champions fall as they age. I'm guessing not that much.

          For example, how many people on the planet today could consistently beat Kasparov? I'd guess it's a small number. Maybe single digits or low double.

          Doctor PhibesD Offline
          Doctor PhibesD Offline
          Doctor Phibes
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @jon-nyc said in Chess geek stuff:

          I'm curious how far the champions fall as they age. I'm guessing not that much.

          For example, how many people on the planet today could consistently beat Kasparov? I'd guess it's a small number. Maybe single digits or low double.

          Kasparov is a slightly unusual case as he retired relatively young. and doesn’t really play much now. If you look at Karpov, who is still somewhat active, he’s currently rated #184. If he put more time in maybe he could improve quite a bit. He’s also older than Kasparov and strength declines with age.

          I was only joking

          1 Reply Last reply
          • taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girlT Offline
            taiwan_girl
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            https://www.nbcnews.com/news/sports/8-year-old-chess-prodigy-breaks-record-defeating-37-year-old-grandmast-rcna139543

            A child prodigy has set a new record in the chess world by besting a grandmaster nearly 30 years older than him on Sunday.

            At just 8-years-old, Singaporean chess prodigy Ashwath Kaushik became the youngest player ever to defeat a grandmaster in a classic tournament game, Chess.com reported.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              That's because the young man worked that much harder at chess than all the other 8 year olds.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Chess is the one activity where white privilege really is systemic.

                Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups