Gov DeSantis Proposes Four New US Amendments
-
DeSantis called for four separate amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which would:
— Impose term limits on members of Congress.
— Require Congress to pass a balanced budget each year.
— Provide the President with line-item veto power.
— Prohibit imposing any law on citizens that doesn’t apply to members of Congress.
Disagree with #1, Not sure on #2, Agree with #3 and #4
-
What's the objection to line-item veto?
Several states have that provision, iirc, and there seems to be no issue.
And birthright citizenship should be defined more clearly. "Subject to the jurisdiction thereof..." is vague.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
DeSantis called for four separate amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which would:
— Impose term limits on members of Congress.
— Require Congress to pass a balanced budget each year.
— Provide the President with line-item veto power.
— Prohibit imposing any law on citizens that doesn’t apply to members of Congress.
Disagree with #1, Not sure on #2, Agree with #3 and #4
@taiwan_girl said in Gov DeSantis Proposes Four New US Amendments:
— Impose term limits on members of Congress.
— Require Congress to pass a balanced budget each year.
— Provide the President with line-item veto power.
— Prohibit imposing any law on citizens that doesn’t apply to members of Congress.
- Maybe
- Yes, OMG Yes!!! #1 with a bullet.
- No, it's not his job (soon to be not her job)
- Yes
-
What's the objection to line-item veto?
Several states have that provision, iirc, and there seems to be no issue.
And birthright citizenship should be defined more clearly. "Subject to the jurisdiction thereof..." is vague.
@George-K said in Gov DeSantis Proposes Four New US Amendments:
What's the objection to line-item veto?
It's great in the system the founders envisioned but in a party system It has the potential to end political compromise. Do you want Johnson and Schumer to hammer out a bipartisan deal just to have Biden strike out all the 'compromise', leaving a partisan bill on the books?
Though I imagine in practice legislative negotiations would include side agreements not to strike out elements of compromise.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login