Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Seattle City Councilwoman

Seattle City Councilwoman

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
38 Posts 13 Posters 430 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Larry
    8 Jul 2020, 22:23

    Let's see... you're leaning libertarian, yet you would vote for Bernie.......

    G Offline
    G Offline
    George K
    wrote on 8 Jul 2020, 22:25 last edited by
    #27

    @Larry said in Seattle City Councilwoman:

    Let's see... you're leaning libertarian, yet you would vote for Bernie.......

    That's not at all what he said:

    I repeatedly said I would pull the libertarian lever back when it looked like Bernie was going to win the primary

    Also, I remember Jon being critical of the Wall Street protestors back in the day when drum circles were a thing.

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      Larry
      wrote on 8 Jul 2020, 22:35 last edited by
      #28

      Ok. I guess I misunderstood....

      1 Reply Last reply
      • X Offline
        X Offline
        xenon
        wrote on 8 Jul 2020, 22:40 last edited by xenon 7 Aug 2020, 22:45
        #29

        The problem with grievance-based discourse (from both parties) is that it makes revolutionary ideas sound appealing.

        This country is great. Like truly. Other countries would love to have the problems we have (for the most part). While we need more than incrementalism in a few areas (healthcare costs, inequality, automation) - but we don't need revolutionary change.

        But that sort of constructive conversation isn't happening anywhere.

        C H T 3 Replies Last reply 8 Jul 2020, 22:57
        • X xenon
          8 Jul 2020, 22:40

          The problem with grievance-based discourse (from both parties) is that it makes revolutionary ideas sound appealing.

          This country is great. Like truly. Other countries would love to have the problems we have (for the most part). While we need more than incrementalism in a few areas (healthcare costs, inequality, automation) - but we don't need revolutionary change.

          But that sort of constructive conversation isn't happening anywhere.

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Copper
          wrote on 8 Jul 2020, 22:57 last edited by Copper 7 Aug 2020, 22:57
          #30

          @xenon said in Seattle City Councilwoman:

          inequality

          There is no inequality where it matters - under the law and opportunity.

          None.

          Dead, solid exactly equal

          And has been for a long time

          If you want equality of outcome, try Russia or North Korea, outcomes are equal for all

          X 1 Reply Last reply 8 Jul 2020, 23:42
          • R Offline
            R Offline
            Rainman
            wrote on 8 Jul 2020, 23:02 last edited by
            #31

            Great comments to read in response to the tweet which began this thread.

            Hey Ax, 'ol buddy! Did you read the comments or responses? What did you think? Do you think there were sufficient comments expressing all viewpoints? What percentage did you agree with?

            1 Reply Last reply
            • X xenon
              8 Jul 2020, 22:40

              The problem with grievance-based discourse (from both parties) is that it makes revolutionary ideas sound appealing.

              This country is great. Like truly. Other countries would love to have the problems we have (for the most part). While we need more than incrementalism in a few areas (healthcare costs, inequality, automation) - but we don't need revolutionary change.

              But that sort of constructive conversation isn't happening anywhere.

              H Offline
              H Offline
              Horace
              wrote on 8 Jul 2020, 23:06 last edited by
              #32

              @xenon said in Seattle City Councilwoman:

              The problem with grievance-based discourse (from both parties) is that it makes revolutionary ideas sound appealing.

              Which grievance based discourse do you see from the right?

              Education is extremely important.

              X 1 Reply Last reply 8 Jul 2020, 23:20
              • C Offline
                C Offline
                Catseye3
                wrote on 8 Jul 2020, 23:07 last edited by
                #33

                Hang around in this forum for ten minutes.

                Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                1 Reply Last reply
                • H Horace
                  8 Jul 2020, 23:06

                  @xenon said in Seattle City Councilwoman:

                  The problem with grievance-based discourse (from both parties) is that it makes revolutionary ideas sound appealing.

                  Which grievance based discourse do you see from the right?

                  X Offline
                  X Offline
                  xenon
                  wrote on 8 Jul 2020, 23:20 last edited by xenon 7 Aug 2020, 23:21
                  #34

                  @Horace

                  Exhibit A: MAGA
                  Exhibit B: the President’s daily litany of grievances broadcasted in Twitter

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • C Copper
                    8 Jul 2020, 22:57

                    @xenon said in Seattle City Councilwoman:

                    inequality

                    There is no inequality where it matters - under the law and opportunity.

                    None.

                    Dead, solid exactly equal

                    And has been for a long time

                    If you want equality of outcome, try Russia or North Korea, outcomes are equal for all

                    X Offline
                    X Offline
                    xenon
                    wrote on 8 Jul 2020, 23:42 last edited by xenon 7 Aug 2020, 23:44
                    #35

                    @Copper naw, there are problems. Running a small biz is harder. Business formation is down.

                    It’s easier for large companies to capture regulators. There are more parts of the economy becoming “winner takes all”

                    It’s harder to hold down a blue collar job.

                    Things are changing - and this creates resentment which in turn creates political instability.

                    But again - none of the things above require you to tear the system down to tackle.

                    C 1 Reply Last reply 9 Jul 2020, 02:06
                    • X xenon
                      8 Jul 2020, 22:40

                      The problem with grievance-based discourse (from both parties) is that it makes revolutionary ideas sound appealing.

                      This country is great. Like truly. Other countries would love to have the problems we have (for the most part). While we need more than incrementalism in a few areas (healthcare costs, inequality, automation) - but we don't need revolutionary change.

                      But that sort of constructive conversation isn't happening anywhere.

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      taiwan_girl
                      wrote on 9 Jul 2020, 01:02 last edited by
                      #36

                      @xenon said in Seattle City Councilwoman:

                      This country is great. Like truly. Other countries would love to have the problems we have (for the most part). While we need more than incrementalism in a few areas (healthcare costs, inequality, automation) - but we don't need revolutionary change.

                      Very true Xenon!! Wise words indeed.

                      It is hard to understand what you have (and take for granted) when you have never been without.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • J Online
                        J Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on 9 Jul 2020, 01:57 last edited by
                        #37

                        I spent enough time in the UK to know that this is heaven on earth.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • X xenon
                          8 Jul 2020, 23:42

                          @Copper naw, there are problems. Running a small biz is harder. Business formation is down.

                          It’s easier for large companies to capture regulators. There are more parts of the economy becoming “winner takes all”

                          It’s harder to hold down a blue collar job.

                          Things are changing - and this creates resentment which in turn creates political instability.

                          But again - none of the things above require you to tear the system down to tackle.

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Copper
                          wrote on 9 Jul 2020, 02:06 last edited by
                          #38

                          @xenon said in Seattle City Councilwoman:

                          @Copper naw, there are problems. Running a small biz is harder. Business formation is down.

                          It’s easier for large companies to capture regulators. There are more parts of the economy becoming “winner takes all”

                          It’s harder to hold down a blue collar job.

                          Things are changing - and this creates resentment which in turn creates political instability.

                          But again - none of the things above require you to tear the system down to tackle.

                          None of that is even remotely true.

                          In fact in every case you mention the law requires equality to be enforced, and it is.

                          The largest corporations in this country are afraid of nothing more than being accused of racism against minorities.

                          And you don't even have to scare them anymore, they are true believers.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes

                          36/38

                          9 Jul 2020, 01:02


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          36 out of 38
                          • First post
                            36/38
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups