Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Whew!

Whew!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
14 Posts 8 Posters 160 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    This is the same guy last February

    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/25/larry-kudlow-says-us-has-contained-the-coronavirus-and-the-economy-is-holding-up-nicely.html

    Fool me once....

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
      #5

      "I really think it's a pretty good situation."

      • Larry Kudlow, July 6th, 2020.

      Screen Shot 2020-07-06 at 10.27.59 AM.png

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        "I really think it's a pretty good situation."

        • Larry Kudlow, July 6th, 2020.

        Screen Shot 2020-07-06 at 10.27.59 AM.png

        AxtremusA Offline
        AxtremusA Offline
        Axtremus
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        @jon-nyc said in Whew!:

        "I really think it's a pretty good situation."

        • Larry Kudlow, July 6th, 2020.

        If nothing else, the stock market agreed with him, at least for today.

        HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
        • CopperC Offline
          CopperC Offline
          Copper
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          ![alt text](28d63a5b-b1b6-4930-a9d4-ff296c549748-image.png image url)

          https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-tests-per-thousand-people-smoothed-7-day

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            If this were simply an artifact of increased testing we wouldn't see the positive test rate growing in step with the case count.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            1 Reply Last reply
            • Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              If you can't trust economists to analyse pandemic data, who can you trust?

              I was only joking

              MikM 1 Reply Last reply
              • AxtremusA Axtremus

                @jon-nyc said in Whew!:

                "I really think it's a pretty good situation."

                • Larry Kudlow, July 6th, 2020.

                If nothing else, the stock market agreed with him, at least for today.

                HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                @Axtremus said in Whew!:

                @jon-nyc said in Whew!:

                "I really think it's a pretty good situation."

                • Larry Kudlow, July 6th, 2020.

                If nothing else, the stock market agreed with him, at least for today.

                With bonds yielding nothing, there is nowhere else for money to go. The stock market is only a good buy now because it's gotten comparatively more attractive.

                Education is extremely important.

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                  If you can't trust economists to analyse pandemic data, who can you trust?

                  MikM Offline
                  MikM Offline
                  Mik
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @Doctor-Phibes said in Whew!:

                  If you can't trust economists to analyse pandemic data, who can you trust?

                  Anybody but economists. Wiccans. Democrats. Moonies. Whatever.

                  “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Horace

                    @Axtremus said in Whew!:

                    @jon-nyc said in Whew!:

                    "I really think it's a pretty good situation."

                    • Larry Kudlow, July 6th, 2020.

                    If nothing else, the stock market agreed with him, at least for today.

                    With bonds yielding nothing, there is nowhere else for money to go. The stock market is only a good buy now because it's gotten comparatively more attractive.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Loki
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    @Horace said in Whew!:

                    @Axtremus said in Whew!:

                    @jon-nyc said in Whew!:

                    "I really think it's a pretty good situation."

                    • Larry Kudlow, July 6th, 2020.

                    If nothing else, the stock market agreed with him, at least for today.

                    With bonds yielding nothing, there is nowhere else for money to go. The stock market is only a good buy now because it's gotten comparatively more attractive.

                    It’s a great point. So much cash too.

                    Both sides are playing a game of chicken with the analysis of Covid, one a scare monger and the other an unrepentant denier. Trouble is the scare monger could lose the game and still win the election. Bad move by the Trumpsters not to hedge unless they know it’s their only shot.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      According to Fauci, we’re still in the first wave... https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000007226421/fauci-warned-we-are-still-knee-deep.html

                      The Brad

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        I have sympathy for that view since the effective R never really got below 1.

                        But in most of the country we’re clearly in the second wave of reacting to it.

                        But really I don’t know how useful it is to fight over who gets to define ‘wave’.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups