Will McCarthy be Vacated from Speakership? Who Will Succeed McCarthy?
-
wrote on 17 Oct 2023, 20:50 last edited by
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 01:12 last edited by
...Jordan does not necessarily need to get the required House majority to take the gavel. The House has elected a speaker a few times in history on a plurality rather than an outright majority.
The House is allowed to decide how the speaker election is held, according to House Practice, so changing the threshold is an option on the table.
In fact, there have been two plurality elections to decide the House speaker in American history.
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 01:13 last edited by
Yeah but the people who don't want Jordan to be speaker wouldn't vote for that either, one would think.
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 03:18 last edited by
Fine.
Let it just sit.
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 16:05 last edited by
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 16:09 last edited by
Is that like "death threats" and their usefulness in the social discussion?
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 16:31 last edited by
@Horace said in Will McCarthy be Vacated from Speakership? Who Will Succeed McCarthy?:
Is that like "death threats" and their usefulness in the social discussion?
I don't it is equivalent to death threats but it is pretty low to do something like that to a spouse.
Of course, there is no proof or evidence of who was doing the message to Mrs. Bacon.
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 17:08 last edited by
He lost vote 2 by an even larger margin.
Time to go, Jimbo.
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 17:35 last edited by
What a bunch of maroons.
What's the end game for these clowns?
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 18:23 last edited by jon-nyc
I think they’ll end up giving full speaker power to the pro-tem guy, without actually electing him speaker.
It’s sort of like the budget, they can’t pass one, so they do ‘continuing resolutions’. Now they bring that concept to house leadership itself.
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 18:28 last edited by
McCarthy was close to and appointed that pro-tem guy, so it will be a lot like a continuance of McCarthy's speakership. And once given power, the pro-tem guy may have even freer rein to compromise with the Dems because he's not gunning for real Speakership and thus not as beholden to the moron caucus.
Is
too optimistic?
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 18:32 last edited by jon-nyc
John Boehner received a vote in this last tally. Lol. That’s a great ‘fuck you’ to Jordan, recall Boehner once called Jordan a ‘legislative terrorist’.
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 23:09 last edited by
Interesting piece about how limping along with McHenry might work, written by a former staffer to Speaker Boehner.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/18/opinion/patrick-mchenry-interim-speaker-powers.html
-
wrote on 18 Oct 2023, 23:16 last edited by Jolly
I ain't skeered...
-
wrote on 19 Oct 2023, 16:07 last edited by
Jordan gives up his effort - wants to enable McHenry to be Speaker Pro-tem.
-
wrote on 20 Oct 2023, 01:57 last edited by Axtremus
The pro tempore guy Rep. McHenry is threatening to quit if the House GOP pressures him to move legislation without explicitly voting to expand the pro tempore's powers.
I don't blame him. It would be chicken shit of the House GOP if they force the pro tempore to move legislation without having the courage to vote to give the pro tempore that power.
-
wrote on 20 Oct 2023, 02:10 last edited by
-
wrote on 20 Oct 2023, 18:18 last edited by
Jim Jordan gets the axe from his caucus.
-
wrote on 20 Oct 2023, 18:22 last edited by jon-nyc
There wasn’t even another name considered. Literally a majority of the conference just voted for him to drop out of the race.
-
wrote on 20 Oct 2023, 18:41 last edited by Renauda
Howard Cosell mode/
Down goes Jordan! Down goes Jordan!
/Howard Cosell mode