Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Birthright Citizenship

Birthright Citizenship

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
37 Posts 9 Posters 182 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Last night, in the GOP food fight, Ramaswamy made an interesting point.

    He wants to end birthright citizenship, claiming that the amendment allowing it has to do with slaves born in the US and nothing to do with someone who happens to be born in the US.

    Those who suggest that we should look at the "intent" of the Constitution and not the actual words would probably disagree. One thing I think everyone can agree upon is that it's a difficult question.

    But, he made an interesting point. Children born of diplomats, while in the US, are not US citizens, are they? If Sasha's wife leaves the Russian embassy in DC to give birth, does that mean that little Pyotr is a US citizen?

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Whatever mechanism is necessary. I suspect it may take a Constitutional Amendment.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
        #3

        It reminds me of Dems saying they’ll get rid of the electoral college.

        And it’s of a piece with his other recent gimmick “fire 75% of federal workers”.

        Enough with the fantasizing, Vivek, how about you tell us what you plan to do given the actual constraints of the office.

        "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
        -Cormac McCarthy

        1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Returning to my question: Are diplomats' children US Citizens? If not, how come?

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • kluursK Offline
            kluursK Offline
            kluurs
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Diplomats accredited to the United States and having full diplomatic immunity are listed on the Department of State’s Diplomatic List (Blue List).[7] If either parent was listed on the Blue List when the applicant was born, the applicant is eligible to apply for this benefit. Both parents do not have to be listed for the applicant to be eligible.[8]

            Not all diplomats or employees of certain designated international organizations admitted to the United States as an A or G nonimmigrant have full diplomatic immunity and appear on the Blue List. For example, the immunities that apply to a foreign consular officer are not the same as those that apply to diplomats. In order to determine eligibility to register for permanent residence based on being born in the United States in diplomatic status, the applicant must submit official confirmation of the diplomatic classification and occupational title of his or her parent at the time of birth.

            USCIS confirms with the Department of State whether the applicant’s parent(s) was on the Blue List at the time of the child’s birth. If an applicant did not have a parent on the Blue List at the time of his or her birth in the United States, then the applicant is a U.S. citizen because the applicant did not have full diplomatic immunity and was therefore subject to U.S. jurisdiction at the time of birth.link text

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              What’s established precedent for children born here of illegal parents?

              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

              AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Mik

                What’s established precedent for children born here of illegal parents?

                AxtremusA Offline
                AxtremusA Offline
                Axtremus
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @Mik said in Birthright Citizenship:

                What’s established precedent for children born here of illegal parents?

                These children are United States citizens.

                Amendment XIV

                Section 1.

                All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

                There is no "exception" for whether the parents are illegal immigrants, only that the children are born or naturalized in the U.S. and subject to the jurisdiction there of.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • MikM Offline
                  MikM Offline
                  Mik
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I know what the text is. How have courts ruled on it? That’s what precedent is.

                  “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                  AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG George K

                    Returning to my question: Are diplomats' children US Citizens? If not, how come?

                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @George-K said in Birthright Citizenship:

                    Returning to my question: Are diplomats' children US Citizens? If not, how come?

                    They’re not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”.

                    A buddy of mine was the son of the Italian consul in San Francisco years ago. I have stories,,,, imagine the most entitled 20 year old you ever met having diplomatic plates.

                    "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                    -Cormac McCarthy

                    George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      @George-K said in Birthright Citizenship:

                      Returning to my question: Are diplomats' children US Citizens? If not, how come?

                      They’re not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”.

                      A buddy of mine was the son of the Italian consul in San Francisco years ago. I have stories,,,, imagine the most entitled 20 year old you ever met having diplomatic plates.

                      George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @jon-nyc said in Birthright Citizenship:

                      They’re not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”.

                      Why not? Is that because of diplomatic status?

                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Yep. Diplomatic immunity. An ambassador could shoot a random citizen on the street and all we could do is send them home, unless their home country waives immunity (which has happened in the past for egregious crimes unrelated to their diplomatic role)

                        "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                        -Cormac McCarthy

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • MikM Mik

                          I know what the text is. How have courts ruled on it? That’s what precedent is.

                          AxtremusA Offline
                          AxtremusA Offline
                          Axtremus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @Mik said in Birthright Citizenship:

                          I know what the text is. How have courts ruled on it? That’s what precedent is.

                          See if “United States v. Wong Kim Ark” floats your boat.
                          https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep169/usrep169649/usrep169649.pdf

                          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                          • AxtremusA Axtremus

                            @Mik said in Birthright Citizenship:

                            I know what the text is. How have courts ruled on it? That’s what precedent is.

                            See if “United States v. Wong Kim Ark” floats your boat.
                            https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep169/usrep169649/usrep169649.pdf

                            George KG Offline
                            George KG Offline
                            George K
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @Axtremus said in Birthright Citizenship:

                            See if “United States v. Wong Kim Ark” floats your boat.
                            https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep169/usrep169649/usrep169649.pdf

                            Not gonna read 80+ pages from 120 years ago.

                            Care to summarize?

                            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • taiwan_girlT Offline
                              taiwan_girlT Offline
                              taiwan_girl
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              I think that the US should get rid of it, but like jolly said, it will probably require some difficulty.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • taiwan_girlT Offline
                                taiwan_girlT Offline
                                taiwan_girl
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/litigation-certainty-trumps-call-end-birthright-citizenship-face-mount-rcna162314

                                “The United States is among the only countries in the world that says even if neither parent is a citizen or even lawfully in the country, their future children are automatic citizens the moment the parents trespass onto our soil,” Trump said

                                and

                                Under Trump’s proposal, at least one parent would need to be a citizen or legal resident for a child to receive birthright citizenship.

                                and

                                Despite Trump’s pledge, the plan to end birthright citizenship is not specifically mentioned in the 2024 Republican platform document, which includes a chapter titled “Seal the Border and Stop the Migrant Invasion.”

                                The platform does include language pledging to “prioritize merit-based immigration” and end chain migration, a term used to refer to people who have U.S. citizenship and then use their status to help other family members enter the country.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Chain- based migration for me, not for thee. That is how Melania’s parents got here after all.

                                  Anyway, this would require an amendment to current immigration law. IOW, a willing house and senate.

                                  "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                                  -Cormac McCarthy

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • JollyJ Offline
                                    JollyJ Offline
                                    Jolly
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Might get it, with all the illegals in the country.

                                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • MikM Offline
                                      MikM Offline
                                      Mik
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Now might be a good time to push it.

                                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                        #19

                                        If he agrees to deport Melania’s parents then sure.

                                        "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                                        -Cormac McCarthy

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • MikM Offline
                                          MikM Offline
                                          Mik
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s a huge opportunity for mischief. But strategically now would be a good time.

                                          I’m not big on changing long standing constitutional principles.

                                          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups