Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. So About This Russian Bounty Thing

So About This Russian Bounty Thing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
108 Posts 13 Posters 2.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CopperC Offline
    CopperC Offline
    Copper
    wrote on last edited by
    #69

    Of course Russians do things like this. I assume we do too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #70

      Whoopsie....

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Away
        MikM Away
        Mik
        wrote on last edited by
        #71

        He is such a turd.

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #72

          So the intelligence community briefed a congressman but not the president?

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          George KG LarryL 2 Replies Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            So the intelligence community briefed a congressman but not the president?

            George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by George K
            #73

            @jon-nyc said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

            So the intelligence community briefed a congressman but not the president?

            That's what Hemingway is implying.

            But, even if they did brief both, why did Schiff not do anything?

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG George K

              @George-K said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

              And if he wasn't told, why the hell not?

              Catseye3C Offline
              Catseye3C Offline
              Catseye3
              wrote on last edited by
              #74

              @George-K said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

              And if he wasn't told, why the hell not?

              https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-got-angry-if-warned-about-russia-so-officials-avoided-2020-7

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                So the intelligence community briefed a congressman but not the president?

                LarryL Offline
                LarryL Offline
                Larry
                wrote on last edited by
                #75

                @jon-nyc said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

                So the intelligence community briefed a congressman but not the president?

                No one "briefed" Adam Schitt. He is constantly digging for anything he can twist into a pretzel to go after Trump with. There are traitors in government who try to help him do that. Just like the Russian conspiracy fraud, he knew there was nothing to it, but he waited for the traitors to build it into a big scandal. He is complicit in yet another act of sedition.

                The intelligence community didn't do squat. They are on record saying it's not even true. Schitt is a traitor, and so is the anonymous person(s) who gave him this unproven rumor.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #76

                  @George-K said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

                  @jon-nyc said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

                  So the intelligence community briefed a congressman but not the president?

                  That's what Hemingway is implying.

                  But, ever if they did brief both, why did Schiff not do anything?

                  If he had put any credence in the briefing and he thought Trump had also been briefed, he would have been on it like flies on Schiff.

                  The whole thing doesn't pass the sniff test.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Away
                    MikM Away
                    Mik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #77

                    It has exactly the same smell as every one of these 'GOTCHA's they have been trotting out for four years.

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #78

                      Well, well, well....

                      https://justthenews.com/government/security/reports-about-russian-bounties-part-based-part-old-reports-intelligence-sources

                      Reports that a Russian military intelligence unit offered bounties on coalition soldiers in Afghanistan are based partially on old information that surfaced more than a decade ago, international intelligence sources said. The sources include both Western-based analysts and front line personnel on the ground in South Asia.

                      Many of the sources spoke to Just the News via encrypted communications, and insisted that their names not be revealed because their lives are at risk.

                      “The only thing new about this story is the date on the headline,” one South Asian contact said. “This is old information, going back to Obama days and before. Everyone who has been involved in Afghanistan heard this a long time ago.”

                      Reports of an alleged deal between the Taliban and Russia’s military intelligence directorate, the GRU, leaked last week, leading to public outrage on many fronts. President Donald Trump has said the claims likely are fabricated, and Democrats in particular have accused Trump of siding with Moscow to deny the truth.

                      No one definitively has determined, though, what the truth is in this situation.

                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                      L Catseye3C 2 Replies Last reply
                      • George KG George K

                        Well, well, well....

                        https://justthenews.com/government/security/reports-about-russian-bounties-part-based-part-old-reports-intelligence-sources

                        Reports that a Russian military intelligence unit offered bounties on coalition soldiers in Afghanistan are based partially on old information that surfaced more than a decade ago, international intelligence sources said. The sources include both Western-based analysts and front line personnel on the ground in South Asia.

                        Many of the sources spoke to Just the News via encrypted communications, and insisted that their names not be revealed because their lives are at risk.

                        “The only thing new about this story is the date on the headline,” one South Asian contact said. “This is old information, going back to Obama days and before. Everyone who has been involved in Afghanistan heard this a long time ago.”

                        Reports of an alleged deal between the Taliban and Russia’s military intelligence directorate, the GRU, leaked last week, leading to public outrage on many fronts. President Donald Trump has said the claims likely are fabricated, and Democrats in particular have accused Trump of siding with Moscow to deny the truth.

                        No one definitively has determined, though, what the truth is in this situation.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Loki
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #79

                        I sincerely hope we follow this movie to the end.

                        NYT I’m looking at you, what you got now that you scared us all up?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • Catseye3C Offline
                          Catseye3C Offline
                          Catseye3
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #80

                          Media Bias Fact Check rates Just the News thusly: "Overall, we rate Just the News moderately Right Biased based on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a reasonable fact check record."

                          For more, go here: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/

                          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                          • taiwan_girlT Offline
                            taiwan_girlT Offline
                            taiwan_girl
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #81

                            I agree that this story is not something that needs to be worried about.

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                              I agree that this story is not something that needs to be worried about.

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Loki
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #82

                              @taiwan_girl said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

                              I agree that this story is not something that needs to be worried about.

                              Oh we do. The NYT said it was worrisome and we need to validate this oft quoted source of news that has devolved to op/ed.

                              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              • L Loki

                                @taiwan_girl said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

                                I agree that this story is not something that needs to be worried about.

                                Oh we do. The NYT said it was worrisome and we need to validate this oft quoted source of news that has devolved to op/ed.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #83

                                @Loki said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

                                @taiwan_girl said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

                                I agree that this story is not something that needs to be worried about.

                                Oh we do. The NYT said it was worrisome and we need to validate this oft quoted source of news that has devolved to op/ed.

                                Bad op-ed.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • MikM Away
                                  MikM Away
                                  Mik
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #84

                                  More like Prop-Ed.

                                  “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • George KG George K

                                    Well, well, well....

                                    https://justthenews.com/government/security/reports-about-russian-bounties-part-based-part-old-reports-intelligence-sources

                                    Reports that a Russian military intelligence unit offered bounties on coalition soldiers in Afghanistan are based partially on old information that surfaced more than a decade ago, international intelligence sources said. The sources include both Western-based analysts and front line personnel on the ground in South Asia.

                                    Many of the sources spoke to Just the News via encrypted communications, and insisted that their names not be revealed because their lives are at risk.

                                    “The only thing new about this story is the date on the headline,” one South Asian contact said. “This is old information, going back to Obama days and before. Everyone who has been involved in Afghanistan heard this a long time ago.”

                                    Reports of an alleged deal between the Taliban and Russia’s military intelligence directorate, the GRU, leaked last week, leading to public outrage on many fronts. President Donald Trump has said the claims likely are fabricated, and Democrats in particular have accused Trump of siding with Moscow to deny the truth.

                                    No one definitively has determined, though, what the truth is in this situation.

                                    Catseye3C Offline
                                    Catseye3C Offline
                                    Catseye3
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #85
                                    This post is deleted!
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • Catseye3C Catseye3

                                      Media Bias Fact Check rates Just the News thusly: "Overall, we rate Just the News moderately Right Biased based on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a reasonable fact check record."

                                      For more, go here: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/

                                      George KG Offline
                                      George KG Offline
                                      George K
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #86

                                      @Catseye3 said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

                                      Media Bias Fact Check rates Just the News thusly: "Overall, we rate Just the News moderately Right Biased based on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a reasonable fact check record."

                                      For more, go here: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/

                                      Here's the front page of today's New York Times. Tell me there's no bias in their reporting of what they consider "The News."

                                      Screen Shot 2020-07-04 at 6.56.07 AM.png

                                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • Catseye3C Offline
                                        Catseye3C Offline
                                        Catseye3
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #87

                                        My comment from the Media Bias Check wasn't meant to be critical. Did you read it also said "High for factual reporting"?

                                        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • Catseye3C Catseye3

                                          My comment from the Media Bias Check wasn't meant to be critical. Did you read it also said "High for factual reporting"?

                                          George KG Offline
                                          George KG Offline
                                          George K
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #88

                                          @Catseye3 said in So About This Russian Bounty Thing:

                                          My comment from the Media Bias Check wasn't meant to be critical. Did you read it also said "High for factual reporting"?

                                          Of course I did. My point is that it mixes editorializing with "factual reporting." When words like "railing," "discordant,"and "divisive" appear in the so-called "news" section, on the front page, above the fold, it makes me wonder what other "factual reporting" The Times is doing.

                                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups