I am Evil
-
wrote on 13 Oct 2022, 22:30 last edited by
Yep. Evil. Worthy of beheading.
-
wrote on 13 Oct 2022, 23:28 last edited by
The Countess of Chester was my local hospital when I lived in the UK - I lived within walking distance, and we stay in the city most summers as Mrs. Phibes folks live there.
It simply beggars belief.
-
wrote on 14 Oct 2022, 00:24 last edited by
Jesus H.
-
wrote on 18 Aug 2023, 13:21 last edited by
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-65960514
Nurse Lucy Letby has been found guilty of murdering seven babies on a neonatal unit, making her the UK's most prolific child serial killer in modern times.
The 33-year-old has also been convicted of trying to kill six other infants at the Countess of Chester Hospital between June 2015 and June 2016.
Letby deliberately injected babies with air, force fed others milk and poisoned two of the infants with insulin.
She refused to appear in the dock for the latest verdicts.
-
wrote on 18 Aug 2023, 13:38 last edited by
Beheading?
More like drawn and quartered...
-
wrote on 18 Aug 2023, 13:58 last edited by
Beheading?
More like drawn and quartered...
There's more....
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66120934
Hospital bosses failed to investigate allegations against Lucy Letby and tried to silence doctors, the lead consultant at the neonatal unit where she worked has told the BBC.
The hospital also delayed calling the police despite months of warnings that the nurse may have been killing babies.
The unit's lead consultant Dr Stephen Brearey first raised concerns about Letby in October 2015.
No action was taken and she went on to attack five more babies, killing two.
-
wrote on 18 Aug 2023, 14:04 last edited by
Being merciful, maybe just hanging for the people who covered up the crime.
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2025, 18:17 last edited by
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgl5yyg1x6o
Child killer Lucy Letby did not murder any babies, a panel of international medical experts reviewing evidence in her case has claimed.
Chairman Dr Shoo Lee told a press conference "in all cases death or injury were due to natural causes or just bad medical care".
Letby, who is serving 15 whole life sentences for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others between 2015 and 2016, has already lost two bids to appeal against her convictions.
The panel's findings are likely to form part of an application which has been made by her lawyers to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) for her case to be investigated as a potential miscarriage of justice.It's hard to imagine what the parents of the babies who died must be going through.
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2025, 18:25 last edited by
Should be able to derive how statistically likely it is for one medical practitioner to be involved with that many babies, dead from those natural causes. I would consider that strong circumstantial evidence, one way or another, depending on how unlucky she must have been to have been involved with that many tragedies.
-
Should be able to derive how statistically likely it is for one medical practitioner to be involved with that many babies, dead from those natural causes. I would consider that strong circumstantial evidence, one way or another, depending on how unlucky she must have been to have been involved with that many tragedies.
wrote on 4 Feb 2025, 18:34 last edited byShould be able to derive how statistically likely it is for one medical practitioner to be involved with that many babies, dead from those natural causes. I would consider that strong circumstantial evidence, one way or another, depending on how unlucky she must have been to have been involved with that many tragedies.
The question is at what point does statistical likelihood become 'beyond all reasonable doubt'. It seems that there is some genuine doubt from people who really ought to know.
-
Should be able to derive how statistically likely it is for one medical practitioner to be involved with that many babies, dead from those natural causes. I would consider that strong circumstantial evidence, one way or another, depending on how unlucky she must have been to have been involved with that many tragedies.
The question is at what point does statistical likelihood become 'beyond all reasonable doubt'. It seems that there is some genuine doubt from people who really ought to know.
wrote on 4 Feb 2025, 18:39 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes A curated and probably self-selected set of people. The "innocence project" style of motivated reasoning can be employed by people who are experts on paper.
-
@Doctor-Phibes A curated and probably self-selected set of people. The "innocence project" style of motivated reasoning can be employed by people who are experts on paper.
wrote on 4 Feb 2025, 18:45 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes A curated and probably self-selected set of people. The "innocence project" style of motivated reasoning can be employed by people who are experts on paper.
Yes, the defence team presumably picked the investigative team.
I keep getting dragged back into reading about this case, probably because it was my local hospital for 8 years. I have friends whose kids were born there, although long before Lucy Letby worked there.
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2025, 19:34 last edited by
Tell the doc to let me have a 10cc syringe and a 23g butterfly and see if I can leave a mark on him while working with a vein.
I can make it look like he was hit by a shovel.
