California vs. Florida
-
Of course, they are trying to make conditions that they know the other side will not accept, so it probably will never happen.
My agree/disagree in BOLD.
QUOTE
Newsom sent a formal debate offer letter to Hannity in July that included rules such as that the debate would be moderated by Hannity, be broadcast live and 90 minutes in length (AGREE), and that both governors would not use notes (AGREE). Newsom also proposed Nevada, Georgia and North Carolina as potential locations.In a letter to Hannity, dated Friday, DeSantis' team offered its own rules for the debate, which diverged from some proposed by Newsom. Some of the differences:
DeSantis suggested four dates from between Sept. 19 to Nov. 8, while Newsom proposed two dates in November.
DeSantis wanted a live audience with a 50-50 split, while Newsom said "no live audience." (I kind of agree with no live audience. It eliminates any distractions)
DeSantis does not want opening remarks, while Newsom would like both participants to get four minutes. (Agree with no opening remarks. Just get right to it.)
DeSantis proposed that they each submit a two-minute-long video that must be approved by Fox News before it is played at the top of the debate. (Goofy idea. Disagree. Just have the debate.)
UNQUOTE -
The unasked question is this: Why is the governor or California engaging in a debate with a declared presidential candidate?
That's rhetorical, of course.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
The unasked question is this: Why is the governor or California engaging in a debate with a declared presidential candidate?
That's rhetorical, of course.
-
The unasked question is this: Why is the governor or California engaging in a debate with a declared presidential candidate?
That's rhetorical, of course.
@George-K said in California vs. Florida:
The unasked question is this: Why is the governor or California engaging in a debate with a declared presidential candidate?
That's rhetorical, of course.
Why is a declared presidential candidate engaging in a debate with the governor of California?
@jolly Which of the conditions set by the participants do you agree with?
-
@George-K said in California vs. Florida:
The unasked question is this: Why is the governor or California engaging in a debate with a declared presidential candidate?
That's rhetorical, of course.
Why is a declared presidential candidate engaging in a debate with the governor of California?
@jolly Which of the conditions set by the participants do you agree with?
@taiwan_girl said in California vs. Florida:
the governor of California?
...rumor is that he's being teed up to be the Dem candidate instead of Biden.
-
@taiwan_girl said in California vs. Florida:
the governor of California?
...rumor is that he's being teed up to be the Dem candidate instead of Biden.
@George-K said in California vs. Florida:
@taiwan_girl said in California vs. Florida:
the governor of California?
...rumor is that he's being teed up to be the Dem candidate instead of Biden.
And this gives him a stage to test those replacement waters.
-
Makes sense. President Biden is certainly not getting better mentally (to state the obvious).
-
The unasked question is this: Why is the governor or California engaging in a debate with a declared presidential candidate?
That's rhetorical, of course.
@George-K said in California vs. Florida:
The unasked question is this: Why is
the governor or Californiaa failing presidential candidate engaging in a debate witha declared presidential candidatesomeone who isn’t even running?That's rhetorical, of course.
Fixed.
