In suburban Chicago
-
wrote on 8 Apr 2020, 21:01 last edited by
One of my former partners is working at a big suburban hospital.
They are only doing 20% of the cases they had in February.
Less than 20% of COVID-19 patients get off the ventilator, and they have two on ECMO.
-
wrote on 8 Apr 2020, 21:27 last edited by
After hearing all of the nice things about ventilators, I think I'd opt out.
-
One of my former partners is working at a big suburban hospital.
They are only doing 20% of the cases they had in February.
Less than 20% of COVID-19 patients get off the ventilator, and they have two on ECMO.
wrote on 8 Apr 2020, 21:41 last edited by@George-K said in In suburban Chicago:
One of my former partners is working at a big suburban hospital.
They are only doing 20% of the cases they had in February.
Less than 20% of COVID-19 patients get off the ventilator, and they have two on ECMO.
umm.
Fewer than. . .
/aqua
right?
Their, fixed it your welcome. -
@George-K said in In suburban Chicago:
One of my former partners is working at a big suburban hospital.
They are only doing 20% of the cases they had in February.
Less than 20% of COVID-19 patients get off the ventilator, and they have two on ECMO.
umm.
Fewer than. . .
/aqua
right?
Their, fixed it your welcome.wrote on 8 Apr 2020, 21:56 last edited by@Rainman said in In suburban Chicago:
@George-K said in In suburban Chicago:
One of my former partners is working at a big suburban hospital.
They are only doing 20% of the cases they had in February.
Less than 20% of COVID-19 patients get off the ventilator, and they have two on ECMO.
umm.
Fewer than. . .
/aqua
right?
Their, fixed it your welcome.*There.
Fixed it....
-
wrote on 8 Apr 2020, 21:57 last edited by
Also, I report, you decide:
-
@Rainman said in In suburban Chicago:
@George-K said in In suburban Chicago:
One of my former partners is working at a big suburban hospital.
They are only doing 20% of the cases they had in February.
Less than 20% of COVID-19 patients get off the ventilator, and they have two on ECMO.
umm.
Fewer than. . .
/aqua
right?
Their, fixed it your welcome.*There.
Fixed it....
wrote on 8 Apr 2020, 21:59 last edited by@George-K said in In suburban Chicago:
@Rainman said in In suburban Chicago:
@George-K said in In suburban Chicago:
One of my former partners is working at a big suburban hospital.
They are only doing 20% of the cases they had in February.
Less than 20% of COVID-19 patients get off the ventilator, and they have two on ECMO.
umm.
Fewer than. . .
/aqua
right?
Their, fixed it your welcome.*There.
Fixed it....
You missed the "your."
.500 -
@George-K said in In suburban Chicago:
@Rainman said in In suburban Chicago:
@George-K said in In suburban Chicago:
One of my former partners is working at a big suburban hospital.
They are only doing 20% of the cases they had in February.
Less than 20% of COVID-19 patients get off the ventilator, and they have two on ECMO.
umm.
Fewer than. . .
/aqua
right?
Their, fixed it your welcome.*There.
Fixed it....
You missed the "your."
.500wrote on 8 Apr 2020, 22:05 last edited by@Rainman said in In suburban Chicago:
@George-K said in In suburban Chicago:
@Rainman said in In suburban Chicago:
@George-K said in In suburban Chicago:
One of my former partners is working at a big suburban hospital.
They are only doing 20% of the cases they had in February.
Less than 20% of COVID-19 patients get off the ventilator, and they have two on ECMO.
umm.
Fewer than. . .
/aqua
right?
Their, fixed it your welcome.*There.
Fixed it....
You missed the "your."
.500Cheap Scotch everywhere. Excellent!
-
wrote on 9 Apr 2020, 00:09 last edited by
@kluurs said in In suburban Chicago:
After hearing all of the nice things about ventilators, I think I'd opt out.
Yeah... it doesn't look attractive, does it?
-
@kluurs said in In suburban Chicago:
After hearing all of the nice things about ventilators, I think I'd opt out.
Yeah... it doesn't look attractive, does it?
wrote on 9 Apr 2020, 00:52 last edited by@Mik said in In suburban Chicago:
@kluurs said in In suburban Chicago:
After hearing all of the nice things about ventilators, I think I'd opt out.
Yeah... it doesn't look attractive, does it?
If we're going to
have death panelstriage patients, wouldn't it make sense to direct resources to those who have the highest probability of survival.On the battlefield, what would be done with an injury that had only a 20% chance of survival when resources are limited?