Explosive News!
-
I am reminded of a contest, from years back, that some newspaper held.
"Write a limerick using the words 'Kazynski,' 'Lewinsky,' and 'Clinton.'"
There once was a gal named Lewinsky
Who played on a flute like Stravinsky
"Twas Hail to the Chief"
On this flute made of beef
That stole the front page from Kaczynski.Said Clinton to young Ms. Lewinsky,
"We don't want to leave clues like Kaczynski,
Since you made such a mess,
Use the hem of your dress
And please wipe that stuff off your chinsky."Lewinsky and Clinton have shown
What Kaczynski must surely have known
That an intern is better
Than a bomb in a letter
When deciding how best to be blown. -
So, I asked Chat GPT...
There once was a gal named Lewinsky,
Who caught the eye of Clinton so risky.
In the Oval they'd meet,
While the nation took heat,
Till Ken Starr made it all rather frisky.But let's not forget Kazynski's plight,
A bomber who caused quite a fright.
His manifesto in hand,
He wreaked havoc on land,
A twisted mind seeking power and might.So Lewinsky and Clinton, their scandal well-known,
While Kazynski's madness was sown.
Different paths they did take,
With choices at stake,
In history's pages, their stories are shown. -
What an interesting story about him. Harvard at 16, PhD in math. Kind of a demented genius I guess.
-
@Horace said in Explosive News!:
Skynet taking over, will be the vindication of his manifesto.
Yeah, maybe so.
But, look at the quality of the limericks I posted which were written by human beings and compare with what ChatGPT spit out.
There's still hope - for a while.
-
@Horace said in Explosive News!:
Skynet taking over, will be the vindication of his manifesto.
Yeah, maybe so.
But, look at the quality of the limericks I posted which were written by human beings and compare with what ChatGPT spit out.
There's still hope - for a while.
@George-K said in Explosive News!:
@Horace said in Explosive News!:
Skynet taking over, will be the vindication of his manifesto.
Yeah, maybe so.
But, look at the quality of the limericks I posted which were written by human beings and compare with what ChatGPT spit out.
There's still hope - for a while.
Exponential growth. This is the tech equivalent of February 2020.
-
Now they are saying suicide. At 81? In a prison hospital?
How and why? I find this doubtful. He's already been in nearly 30 years. Why now?
-
-
Me: "So, it looks like Ted Kazyinski died by suicide."
Mrs. George: "What? Why would he do that?"
Me: "Really, he's been in prison for, what, 40 years, and now he decides to commit suicide?"
Mrs. George: "Right. How old was he?"
Me: "I believe 81?"
Mrs. George: "That's what he died of."