Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Kennedy embarrasses another judge

Kennedy embarrasses another judge

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
7 Posts 4 Posters 62 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hell, even I know what a Brady motion is.

    https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/another-biden-judicial-nominee-stumbles-at-confirmation-hearing

    A second Biden federal trial court nominee was tripped up over Republican confirmation hearing questions, this time involving a senator’s inquiry about a criminal law tenet.

    Kato Crews, a magistrate judge in Denver who’s been selected for a district court seat there, couldn’t define a Brady motion and how to analyze it at his confirmation hearing on Wednesday.

    The motion, enshrined in a landmark Supreme Court ruling, is a request by a defendant to compel prosecutors in a criminal case to turn over potentially favorable evidence.

    “I believe that the Brady case involved something regarding the Second Amendment,” Crews said. “I have not had an occasion to address that.”

    The question was posed by Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), who’s known for quizzing judicial nominees from both parties about the law and courtroom procedure.

    Serving as a federal magistrate judge since 2018, Crews has presided over six cases that have gone to verdict or judgment, none of which have been criminal cases, according to his Senate Judiciary Questionnaire.

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    George KG 1 Reply Last reply
    • CopperC Offline
      CopperC Offline
      Copper
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Judge Crews appears to me to be qualified.

      848db293-f2e5-47dd-a122-2cea29e2a438-image.png

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Just no.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          He may bring a certain indescribable creative genius to the bench though.

          Education is extremely important.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG George K

            Hell, even I know what a Brady motion is.

            https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/another-biden-judicial-nominee-stumbles-at-confirmation-hearing

            A second Biden federal trial court nominee was tripped up over Republican confirmation hearing questions, this time involving a senator’s inquiry about a criminal law tenet.

            Kato Crews, a magistrate judge in Denver who’s been selected for a district court seat there, couldn’t define a Brady motion and how to analyze it at his confirmation hearing on Wednesday.

            The motion, enshrined in a landmark Supreme Court ruling, is a request by a defendant to compel prosecutors in a criminal case to turn over potentially favorable evidence.

            “I believe that the Brady case involved something regarding the Second Amendment,” Crews said. “I have not had an occasion to address that.”

            The question was posed by Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), who’s known for quizzing judicial nominees from both parties about the law and courtroom procedure.

            Serving as a federal magistrate judge since 2018, Crews has presided over six cases that have gone to verdict or judgment, none of which have been criminal cases, according to his Senate Judiciary Questionnaire.

            George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Bloomberg said in Kennedy embarrasses another judge:

            Kennedy (R-La.), who’s known for quizzing judicial nominees from both parties about the law

            Yeah, as if that's an outrage. He's a LAWyer and a JUDGE of the LAW. He should know what the LAW is.

            And a Brady motion is not exactly obscure.

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                A "Supercut" of Kennedy's questioning.

                Link to video

                Now, in fairness, I suppose this is kind of obscure stuff....to most of us.

                But, in a job interview, which these hearings basically are, shouldn't you be prepared for this stuff.

                And, questions about Brady rules and the Constitution should not be exactly obscure to a judge.

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups