Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. He's 81

He's 81

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
14 Posts 6 Posters 93 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG George K

    @Doctor-Phibes said in He's 81:

    I think the company I work for has a limit of maybe 65 or 67 for the CEO.

    The university had a policy that you couldn't be department chair after age 65. You could work, but not be chair.

    JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @George-K said in He's 81:

    @Doctor-Phibes said in He's 81:

    I think the company I work for has a limit of maybe 65 or 67 for the CEO.

    The university had a policy that you couldn't be department chair after age 65. You could work, but not be chair.

    I think that's fair.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Jolly

      @George-K said in He's 81:

      @Doctor-Phibes said in He's 81:

      I think the company I work for has a limit of maybe 65 or 67 for the CEO.

      The university had a policy that you couldn't be department chair after age 65. You could work, but not be chair.

      I think that's fair.

      Doctor PhibesD Online
      Doctor PhibesD Online
      Doctor Phibes
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      @Jolly said in He's 81:

      @George-K said in He's 81:

      @Doctor-Phibes said in He's 81:

      I think the company I work for has a limit of maybe 65 or 67 for the CEO.

      The university had a policy that you couldn't be department chair after age 65. You could work, but not be chair.

      I think that's fair.

      I don't think it's good for anybody having executives working until they're ready for the grave. You have to question why somebody would want to do it.

      I was only joking

      1 Reply Last reply
      • Catseye3C Offline
        Catseye3C Offline
        Catseye3
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        I'd rather see some criterion other than arbitrary age -- some benchmark having to do with competence or smarts or energy level (doesn't fall asleep in the portrait like Justice Ginsberg did).

        The trick would be how to compel them to take the test, but a smart, sharp, competent and lively 75-year-old or even older doesn't deserve to be driven out to pasture because of a birthday.

        Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

        Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
        • Catseye3C Catseye3

          I'd rather see some criterion other than arbitrary age -- some benchmark having to do with competence or smarts or energy level (doesn't fall asleep in the portrait like Justice Ginsberg did).

          The trick would be how to compel them to take the test, but a smart, sharp, competent and lively 75-year-old or even older doesn't deserve to be driven out to pasture because of a birthday.

          Doctor PhibesD Online
          Doctor PhibesD Online
          Doctor Phibes
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          @Catseye3 said in He's 81:

          I'd rather see some criterion other than arbitrary age -- some benchmark having to do with competence or smarts or energy level (doesn't fall asleep in the portrait like Justice Ginsberg did).

          The trick would be how to compel them to take the test, but a smart, sharp, competent and lively 75-year-old or even older doesn't deserve to be driven out to pasture because of a birthday.

          Person, woman, man, camera, TV

          Genius!

          I was only joking

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            You can't rely on subjective criteria. These guys are masters at gaming the system.

            Pick a bright line and anchor it hard.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            Catseye3C taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
            • JollyJ Jolly

              You can't rely on subjective criteria. These guys are masters at gaming the system.

              Pick a bright line and anchor it hard.

              Catseye3C Offline
              Catseye3C Offline
              Catseye3
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              @Jolly said in He's 81:

              You can't rely on subjective criteria. These guys are masters at gaming the system.

              What subjective? And if they're that good, maybe they shouldn't be thrown away.

              Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

              Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                The graveyards are filled with indispensable men - Charles DeGaulle.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  You can't rely on subjective criteria. These guys are masters at gaming the system.

                  Pick a bright line and anchor it hard.

                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @Jolly said in He's 81:

                  You can't rely on subjective criteria. These guys are masters at gaming the system.

                  Pick a bright line and anchor it hard.

                  i agree. Have it also apply to judges, etc.

                  Private company, you can do what you want.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • Catseye3C Catseye3

                    @Jolly said in He's 81:

                    You can't rely on subjective criteria. These guys are masters at gaming the system.

                    What subjective? And if they're that good, maybe they shouldn't be thrown away.

                    Doctor PhibesD Online
                    Doctor PhibesD Online
                    Doctor Phibes
                    wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                    #12

                    @Catseye3 said in He's 81:

                    @Jolly said in He's 81:

                    You can't rely on subjective criteria. These guys are masters at gaming the system.

                    What subjective? And if they're that good, maybe they shouldn't be thrown away.

                    They're not that good. If you can't fix the country by the time you're 75 then you need to let have somebody else have a go, because it doesn't get any better at that point.

                    I was only joking

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • AxtremusA Away
                      AxtremusA Away
                      Axtremus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      If the voters want to keep voting for an octogenarian, who are you to tell them otherwise?

                      Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Axtremus

                        If the voters want to keep voting for an octogenarian, who are you to tell them otherwise?

                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                        #14

                        @Axtremus said in He's 81:

                        If the voters want to keep voting for an octogenarian, who are you to tell them otherwise?

                        I'm John Fucking D'Oh, that's who.

                        Sorry, no I'm not. I'm Vincent Fucking Price, that's who!

                        I was only joking

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups