Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support

Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
36 Posts 8 Posters 110 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    @LuFins-Dad No it just permits it.

    MikM Away
    MikM Away
    Mik
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @jon-nyc said in Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support:

    @LuFins-Dad No it just permits it.

    But secondary to fiduciary responsibility. Of course, that's rather difficult to prove. The caveat here is to know your financial advisor.

    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

    jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Mik

      @jon-nyc said in Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support:

      @LuFins-Dad No it just permits it.

      But secondary to fiduciary responsibility. Of course, that's rather difficult to prove. The caveat here is to know your financial advisor.

      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #27

      @Mik I don’t think it eliminates fiduciary responsibility per se, I think it allows considering ESG ratings to be considered within the bounds of fiduciary responsibility.

      But I’m not entirely sure about that.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      MikM 1 Reply Last reply
      • HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote on last edited by
        #28

        The only cut and dried effect of the original legislation I could see, was that funds with explicit ESG goals were prohibited. The veto would have reinstated that rule.

        The language about ESG being an allowed parameter, but within existing fiduciary responsibilities, seems meaningless, if maybe relevant in a court where a case in point might be argued. There are always ways to hand-wave an economic connection to social or environmental values.

        Education is extremely important.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          @Mik I don’t think it eliminates fiduciary responsibility per se, I think it allows considering ESG ratings to be considered within the bounds of fiduciary responsibility.

          But I’m not entirely sure about that.

          MikM Away
          MikM Away
          Mik
          wrote on last edited by
          #29

          @jon-nyc said in Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support:

          @Mik I don’t think it eliminates fiduciary responsibility per se, I think it allows considering ESG ratings to be considered within the bounds of fiduciary responsibility.

          But I’m not entirely sure about that.

          It doesn't eliminate it at all. But as I read it, it might only come into play if the decision were between two roughly equal financial instruments where one was associated with ESG programs and the other was not.

          As always, the devil is in the details, and also the implementation.

          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

          1 Reply Last reply
          • LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins Dad
            wrote on last edited by
            #30

            My problem is the “Social” of the governance. We need less corporate involvement in the social issues of the day. We don’t need companies increasing their DEI initiatives to drive up share price.

            The Brad

            LuFins DadL AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
            • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

              My problem is the “Social” of the governance. We need less corporate involvement in the social issues of the day. We don’t need companies increasing their DEI initiatives to drive up share price.

              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #31

              @LuFins-Dad said in Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support:

              My problem is the “Social” of the governance. We need less corporate involvement in the social issues of the day. We don’t need companies increasing their DEI initiatives to drive up share price.

              It also vastly increases Union power.

              The Brad

              AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
              • LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote on last edited by
                #32

                So… If I wanted to invest into funds that don’t do so well on the ESG scoreboard, which would those be?

                The Brad

                AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                  My problem is the “Social” of the governance. We need less corporate involvement in the social issues of the day. We don’t need companies increasing their DEI initiatives to drive up share price.

                  AxtremusA Offline
                  AxtremusA Offline
                  Axtremus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #33

                  @LuFins-Dad said in Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support:

                  My problem is the “Social” of the governance. We need less corporate involvement in the social issues of the day. We don’t need companies increasing their DEI initiatives to drive up share price.

                  How do you go from "social" in the ESG context to "DEI"?
                  Kindly explain.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                    @LuFins-Dad said in Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support:

                    My problem is the “Social” of the governance. We need less corporate involvement in the social issues of the day. We don’t need companies increasing their DEI initiatives to drive up share price.

                    It also vastly increases Union power.

                    AxtremusA Offline
                    AxtremusA Offline
                    Axtremus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #34

                    @LuFins-Dad said in Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support:

                    @LuFins-Dad said in Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support:

                    My problem is the “Social” of the governance. We need less corporate involvement in the social issues of the day. We don’t need companies increasing their DEI initiatives to drive up share price.

                    It also vastly increases Union power.

                    Also, how do you go from "DEI" to Union power?
                    Kindly explain.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                      So… If I wanted to invest into funds that don’t do so well on the ESG scoreboard, which would those be?

                      AxtremusA Offline
                      AxtremusA Offline
                      Axtremus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #35

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Biden vetoes resolution that had bipartisan support:

                      So… If I wanted to invest into funds that don’t do so well on the ESG scoreboard, which would those be?

                      https://www.morningstar.com/esg-screener

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #36

                        ESG means whatever its gatekeepers want it to mean, Ax. And it clearly has evolved over time.

                        It’s basically a privatized version of Senator Warren’s monstrous proposal from 2019.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups