Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. RCP: Biden's story on documents doesn't add up.

RCP: Biden's story on documents doesn't add up.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
9 Posts 5 Posters 51 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Offline
    MikM Offline
    Mik
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-document-discovery-doesn-t-add-up/ar-AA16Gsp9?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=06f5ef6cd376405b936b14b6b930638e

    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Why didn't the FBI raid Biden's house?

      Why did they allow his legal team to go through the documents without them?

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      George KG AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
      • JollyJ Jolly

        Why didn't the FBI raid Biden's house?

        Why did they allow his legal team to go through the documents without them?

        George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Jolly said in RCP: Biden's story on documents doesn't add up.:

        Why didn't the FBI raid Biden's house?

        McCarthy answers that as I commented in another thread.

        Why did they allow his legal team to go through the documents without them?

        Because Biden.

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Again, equal justice under the law.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            Why didn't the FBI raid Biden's house?

            Why did they allow his legal team to go through the documents without them?

            AxtremusA Away
            AxtremusA Away
            Axtremus
            wrote on last edited by Axtremus
            #5

            @Jolly said in RCP: Biden's story on documents doesn't add up.:

            Why didn't the FBI raid Biden's house?

            Because the FBI could (and did) search the house without raiding.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              More McCarthy: He didn't 'self-report.'

              With yet more classified documents seized during a long-overdue search by the FBI of the president’s Wilmington, Del., home, President Biden’s apologists are even more stridently portraying him as a cooperative public servant who “self-reported” his wrongdoing — as compared to his predecessor, who fought government efforts to acquire records he retained for well over a year.

              Put aside that this is largely beside the point, the main issue being Biden’s serial violations of the federal criminal law that controls classified intelligence, not how supposedly helpful he has been to investigators. The fact is, he did not self-report — certainly not in the manner he suggests.

              To “self-report” a crime, a person needs to report it to law enforcement authorities. Biden and his aides absolutely did not do that. Moreover, a close look at the timeline elucidates that the White House hoped this issue would slip quietly into a black hole, with no publicity and no criminal investigation.

              On Nov. 2, 2022, the first batch of classified documents — some of which were marked “TS/SCI” (i.e., top secret, sensitive compartmented information), the classification level applied to the government’s most sensitive intelligence — were found by Biden’s private lawyers at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, in an office the president used as a private citizen after his term as Obama administration vice president ended.

              This was indicative of several felony offenses of federal law. First, the Penn Biden Center did not open until February 2018. Biden obviously took the documents when he left the Obama White House in January 2017, so they had to have been illegally retained at some other unauthorized location for 13 months — meaning they had to have been illegally transported at least twice. Second, Biden directed his Penn Biden Center office to be packed up by his private lawyers, who did not have security clearances (and by the way, even if they had them, that would not necessarily mean they’d be authorized to review TS/SCI documents). Causing national defense information to be exposed to unauthorized persons is also a crime.

              What happened next is critical: The Biden private attorney who took the lead on the first batch of documents is Patrick Moore. Moore did not report his discovery of highly classified documents retained in an unlawful place to law-enforcement — i.e., to the FBI or the Department of Justice (DOJ). He reported them to the Biden White House.

              More of the story and timeline at the link.

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG George K

                More McCarthy: He didn't 'self-report.'

                With yet more classified documents seized during a long-overdue search by the FBI of the president’s Wilmington, Del., home, President Biden’s apologists are even more stridently portraying him as a cooperative public servant who “self-reported” his wrongdoing — as compared to his predecessor, who fought government efforts to acquire records he retained for well over a year.

                Put aside that this is largely beside the point, the main issue being Biden’s serial violations of the federal criminal law that controls classified intelligence, not how supposedly helpful he has been to investigators. The fact is, he did not self-report — certainly not in the manner he suggests.

                To “self-report” a crime, a person needs to report it to law enforcement authorities. Biden and his aides absolutely did not do that. Moreover, a close look at the timeline elucidates that the White House hoped this issue would slip quietly into a black hole, with no publicity and no criminal investigation.

                On Nov. 2, 2022, the first batch of classified documents — some of which were marked “TS/SCI” (i.e., top secret, sensitive compartmented information), the classification level applied to the government’s most sensitive intelligence — were found by Biden’s private lawyers at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, in an office the president used as a private citizen after his term as Obama administration vice president ended.

                This was indicative of several felony offenses of federal law. First, the Penn Biden Center did not open until February 2018. Biden obviously took the documents when he left the Obama White House in January 2017, so they had to have been illegally retained at some other unauthorized location for 13 months — meaning they had to have been illegally transported at least twice. Second, Biden directed his Penn Biden Center office to be packed up by his private lawyers, who did not have security clearances (and by the way, even if they had them, that would not necessarily mean they’d be authorized to review TS/SCI documents). Causing national defense information to be exposed to unauthorized persons is also a crime.

                What happened next is critical: The Biden private attorney who took the lead on the first batch of documents is Patrick Moore. Moore did not report his discovery of highly classified documents retained in an unlawful place to law-enforcement — i.e., to the FBI or the Department of Justice (DOJ). He reported them to the Biden White House.

                More of the story and timeline at the link.

                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @George-K McCarthy seems to be nitpicking. The White House reported them to the national archives, the rightful guardian of the documents, who reported it to the DoJ.

                If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

                George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  @George-K McCarthy seems to be nitpicking. The White House reported them to the national archives, the rightful guardian of the documents, who reported it to the DoJ.

                  George KG Offline
                  George KG Offline
                  George K
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @jon-nyc said in RCP: Biden's story on documents doesn't add up.:

                  @George-K McCarthy seems to be nitpicking. The White House reported them to the national archives, the rightful guardian of the documents, who reported it to the DoJ.

                  Yeah, but his point is that it should have been reported to law enforcement, because possession is a crime - the last paragraph of what I cited, and expanded in the next paragraph in the article.

                  National Archives didn't report it either.

                  Down in the article he points out that the Archives is refusing to cooperate with GOP House investigations, under the guise of "investigation in progress."

                  "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                  The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I believe the National Archives did inform DoJ.

                    I’m ok with the NA decision. Purely partisan committees shouldn’t be able to interfere with ongoing investigations. There’s plenty of opportunity to investigate it after the fact when actual oversight - rather than pure mischief- can be done.

                    If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups