Volokh vs State of New York
-
wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 12:41 last edited by
Volokh v. N.Y. A.G.: "New York Can't Target Protected Online Speech by Calling It 'Hateful Conduct'"
NEW YORK, N.Y., Dec. 1, 2022 — Today, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression sued New York Attorney General Letitia James, challenging a new state law that forces websites and apps to address online speech that someone, somewhere finds humiliating or vilifying.
The law is titled “Social media networks; hateful conduct prohibited,” but it actually targets speech the state doesn’t like — even if that speech is fully protected by the First Amendment.
“New York politicians are slapping a speech-police badge on my chest because I run a blog,” said plaintiff Eugene Volokh, who co-founded The Volokh Conspiracy legal blog in 2002. “I started the blog to share interesting and important legal stories, not to police readers’ speech at the government’s behest.”
The law forces internet platforms of all stripes to publish a policy explaining how they will respond to online expression that could “vilify, humiliate, or incite violence” based on a protected class, like religion, gender, or race. The law also requires the platforms to create a way for visitors to complain about “hateful” content or comments, and mandates that they answer complaints with a direct response. Refusal to comply could mean investigations from the attorney general’s office, subpoenas, and daily fines of $1,000 per violation.
New York’s law doesn’t define “vilify,” “humiliate,” or “incite.” Yet, it targets speech that could simply be perceived by someone, somewhere, at some point in time, to vilify or humiliate, rendering the law’s scope entirely subjective. (The First Amendment does not protect inciting imminent violence, but New York’s law offers no indication, as the First Amendment requires, that it applies only to speech directed to and likely to produce imminent lawless action.)
-
wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 12:55 last edited by
Good.
-
wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 13:04 last edited by
Saw this yesterday. FIRE is today what the ACLU was in its glory days.
-
wrote on 2 Dec 2022, 13:09 last edited by George K 12 Feb 2022, 13:10
@jon-nyc said in Volokh vs State of New York:
Saw this yesterday. FIRE is today what the ACLU was in its glory days.
Indeed. Can you imagine the ACLU supporting the march of the Nazis in Skokie today?
Actually can you imagine anyone supporting it today (cf Twitter v West). I know, it was an "incitement to violence" but...