Hmm, that’s interesting…
-
Masters is trending in the Arizona Senate Race… Close enough that some prognosticators are predicting it will go Red…
-
Seeing several of these trends.
The Rajin' Cajun says that the Democrat's message (abortion) isn't resonating at the kitchen table. Gas prices, food prices, 401K's are.
"It's the economy, stupid."
Hell, even one poll says Pennsylvania is a toss-up.
-
Seeing several of these trends.
The Rajin' Cajun says that the Democrat's message (abortion) isn't resonating at the kitchen table. Gas prices, food prices, 401K's are.
"It's the economy, stupid."
Hell, even one poll says Pennsylvania is a toss-up.
@George-K said in Hmm, that’s interesting…:
Seeing several of these trends.
The Rajin' Cajun says that the Democrat's message (abortion) isn't resonating at the kitchen table. Gas prices, food prices, 401K's are.
"It's the economy, stupid."
Hell, even one poll says Pennsylvania is a toss-up.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Oz has been hammering the crime issue. It seems to be resonating.
And Uncle Festus ain't helped himself.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion.
-
@George-K said in Hmm, that’s interesting…:
Seeing several of these trends.
The Rajin' Cajun says that the Democrat's message (abortion) isn't resonating at the kitchen table. Gas prices, food prices, 401K's are.
"It's the economy, stupid."
Hell, even one poll says Pennsylvania is a toss-up.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Oz has been hammering the crime issue. It seems to be resonating.
And Uncle Festus ain't helped himself.
-
@Jolly said in Hmm, that’s interesting…:
And Uncle Festus ain't helped himself.
Uncle Fester on the Adams Family
Festus on Gunsmoke
@Copper said in Hmm, that’s interesting…:
@Jolly said in Hmm, that’s interesting…:
And Uncle Festus ain't helped himself.
Uncle Fester on the Adams Family
Festus on Gunsmoke
I'll go for Fester. At least Festus could sing.
-
This could get interesting. Mail in ballots have to be dated by the submitter per state law. In my view it's either the law or it's not. In this case it is. Calling it a technicality is ridiculous. Laws live and die on technicalities.
-
This could get interesting. Mail in ballots have to be dated by the submitter per state law. In my view it's either the law or it's not. In this case it is. Calling it a technicality is ridiculous. Laws live and die on technicalities.
@Mik said in Hmm, that’s interesting…:
This could get interesting. Mail in ballots have to be dated by the submitter per state law. In my view it's either the law or it's not. In this case it is. Calling it a technicality is ridiculous. Laws live and die on technicalities.
Has anyone ever figured out whether that made a difference in the 2020 election?
-
Again:
- Election Day should be a national holiday.
- Early voting is only allowed starting three weeks before the election. You will have to have a valid excuse to vote early. And you must vote in person.
- Mail-in ballots should be rare, traceable, signed appropriately with a copy of ID enclosed and a witness' signature. They may not be post-marked more than 21 days from Election Day.
- Voting early or on Election Day will require picture ID and the ballot will be cast on paper.
- Observers from all candidates on the ballot will be required at all polling stations.
- All ballots must be traceable at all points of the voting and vote counting process.
-
@Jolly said in Hmm, that’s interesting…:
The courts let it slide one time.
I think they may not slide this time.
Lawyer up.
But do courts have the authority to ‘let it slide’ when the letter of the law is very clear?
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
@Jolly said in Hmm, that’s interesting…:
The courts let it slide one time.
I think they may not slide this time.
Lawyer up.
But do courts have the authority to ‘let it slide’ when the letter of the law is very clear?
@Mik said in Hmm, that’s interesting…:
@Jolly said in Hmm, that’s interesting…:
The courts let it slide one time.
I think they may not slide this time.
Lawyer up.
But do courts have the authority to ‘let it slide’ when the letter of the law is very clear?
To be fair, that wasn’t really the question. The question was whether the State Executive had the authority to waive that requirement under the broader auspices of the State of Emergency that most states had enacted for COVID. The short answer is the courts thought so. Whether the courts thought it was appropriate or not wasn’t really the issue.
