Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief
-
I wouldn’t be surprised if he changed it again to add an opt-out provision, which would remove standing from that Indiana plaintiff.
They’ll end up, after a lot of drama, with the same formula they use every time they have a trifecta: take away health care and food assistance from low income families and use the money to fund tax cuts for their donors.
-
I wouldn’t be surprised if he changed it again to add an opt-out provision, which would remove standing from that Indiana plaintiff.
@jon-nyc said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
I wouldn’t be surprised if he changed it again to add an opt-out provision, which would remove standing from that Indiana plaintiff.
While essentially admitting that they know this thing can’t stand up to any sort of legal challenge, so try to eliminate anybody with possible standing…
I’m still not convinced that Congressional Republicans, while a minority, wouldn’t have standing to file on their own. But I’m also fairly certain they would rather have it as a campaign issue in November rather than squashing it in October and I’m not sure reversing course in January will be feasible.
The Brad
-
@jon-nyc said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
I wouldn’t be surprised if he changed it again to add an opt-out provision, which would remove standing from that Indiana plaintiff.
While essentially admitting that they know this thing can’t stand up to any sort of legal challenge, so try to eliminate anybody with possible standing…
I’m still not convinced that Congressional Republicans, while a minority, wouldn’t have standing to file on their own. But I’m also fairly certain they would rather have it as a campaign issue in November rather than squashing it in October and I’m not sure reversing course in January will be feasible.
@LuFins-Dad said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
@jon-nyc said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
I wouldn’t be surprised if he changed it again to add an opt-out provision, which would remove standing from that Indiana plaintiff.
While essentially admitting that they know this thing can’t stand up to any sort of legal challenge, so try to eliminate anybody with possible standing…
I’m still not convinced that Congressional Republicans, while a minority, wouldn’t have standing to file on their own. But I’m also fairly certain they would rather have it as a campaign issue in November rather than squashing it in October and I’m not sure reversing course in January will be feasible.
It's a campaign issue.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@Mik said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
Why not? It’s not like it’s a law.
By January how many people will have had $10K-$20K knocked off their debt. It's one thing to stop the forgiveness before it happens, it's another thing to go ack and tell these people that you're putting $10K back on their ledger...
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
@jon-nyc said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
I wouldn’t be surprised if he changed it again to add an opt-out provision, which would remove standing from that Indiana plaintiff.
While essentially admitting that they know this thing can’t stand up to any sort of legal challenge, so try to eliminate anybody with possible standing…
I’m still not convinced that Congressional Republicans, while a minority, wouldn’t have standing to file on their own. But I’m also fairly certain they would rather have it as a campaign issue in November rather than squashing it in October and I’m not sure reversing course in January will be feasible.
It's a campaign issue.
@Jolly said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
@LuFins-Dad said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
@jon-nyc said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
I wouldn’t be surprised if he changed it again to add an opt-out provision, which would remove standing from that Indiana plaintiff.
While essentially admitting that they know this thing can’t stand up to any sort of legal challenge, so try to eliminate anybody with possible standing…
I’m still not convinced that Congressional Republicans, while a minority, wouldn’t have standing to file on their own. But I’m also fairly certain they would rather have it as a campaign issue in November rather than squashing it in October and I’m not sure reversing course in January will be feasible.
It's a campaign issue.
And you don't have a huge frigging issue with that?
-
@Jolly said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
@LuFins-Dad said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
@jon-nyc said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
I wouldn’t be surprised if he changed it again to add an opt-out provision, which would remove standing from that Indiana plaintiff.
While essentially admitting that they know this thing can’t stand up to any sort of legal challenge, so try to eliminate anybody with possible standing…
I’m still not convinced that Congressional Republicans, while a minority, wouldn’t have standing to file on their own. But I’m also fairly certain they would rather have it as a campaign issue in November rather than squashing it in October and I’m not sure reversing course in January will be feasible.
It's a campaign issue.
And you don't have a huge frigging issue with that?
@LuFins-Dad said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
@Jolly said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
@LuFins-Dad said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
@jon-nyc said in Ever so quietly backtracking on student loan relief:
I wouldn’t be surprised if he changed it again to add an opt-out provision, which would remove standing from that Indiana plaintiff.
While essentially admitting that they know this thing can’t stand up to any sort of legal challenge, so try to eliminate anybody with possible standing…
I’m still not convinced that Congressional Republicans, while a minority, wouldn’t have standing to file on their own. But I’m also fairly certain they would rather have it as a campaign issue in November rather than squashing it in October and I’m not sure reversing course in January will be feasible.
It's a campaign issue.
And you don't have a huge frigging issue with that?
I know better.
The problem is the millions who swallow this crap whole. And neither you nor I are going to reach them in time. If ever.
