Tulsi Time

[George K]

[Doctor Phibes]

@George-K said in Tulsi Time:

@Renauda said in Tulsi Time:

Sad to see her sell out. I used to respect her.
Шлюха такая.

I agree with you about her stance on Ukraine - which sort of aligns with Carlson's "Not my problem" stance.

Didn’t the US try that approach in the 1930’s?

[Mik]

I think you would be hard pressed to identify an international situation that would be of more importance than Ukraine at this time

[Doctor Phibes]

@Mik said in Tulsi Time:

I think you would be hard pressed to identify an international situation that would be of more importance than Ukraine at this time

You have to ask why Tucker Carlson is taking the stance that he is.

[LuFins Dad]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Tulsi Time:

@Mik said in Tulsi Time:

I think you would be hard pressed to identify an international situation that would be of more importance than Ukraine at this time

You have to ask why Tucker Carlson is taking the stance that he is.

Simple. His job is to always take the opposite view of the other tribe…

[Jolly]

@LuFins-Dad said in Tulsi Time:

@Doctor-Phibes said in Tulsi Time:

@Mik said in Tulsi Time:

I think you would be hard pressed to identify an international situation that would be of more importance than Ukraine at this time

You have to ask why Tucker Carlson is taking the stance that he is.

Simple. His job is to always take the opposite view of the other tribe…

In this case, I don't think so. Tucker was out before many on the right had made up their mind one way or the other. He sees the war in Ukraine as a regional struggle without as mnay global implications as many do. His opinion is that NATO expansion, or the threat of NATO expansion has stirred the Russian bear, rather than the view of many that Putin would like to reconsolidate much of the old Soviet Union and make his place in hiostory.

[Renauda]

@Jolly

Ironically Carlson has latched lock, stock and barrel onto John Mearsheimer’s assessment of the Putin’s Ukraine War. I guess Mearsheimer’s public of support of Bernie Sanders bid in 2020 is of no consequence.

Then there’s Tulsi and Sanders….but that’s another story.

Carlson might want to do his homework.

[Jolly]

@Renauda said in Tulsi Time:

@Jolly

Ironically Carlson has latched lock, stock and barrel onto John Mearsheimer’s assessment of the Putin’s Ukraine War. I guess Mearsheimer’s public of support of Bernie Sanders bid in 2020 is of no consequence.

Then there’s Tulsi and Sanders….but that’s another story.

Carlson might want to do his homework.

There's a horseshoe theory in politics. Maybe that's the case.

[Renauda]

@Jolly

At least you concede that Carlson is far right. Nevertheless, the only horseshoe in this story is the one aimed at Carlson’s festering cakehole.

[Jolly]

TuCa does what he does. I'll take him, over Rachel MadCow.

[Doctor Phibes]

I don't think the shoe is the part of the horse that I would associate him with.

[Renauda]

@Jolly said in Tulsi Time:

TuCa does what he does. I'll take him, over Rachel MadCow.

I’ll take neither, thank you very much. Both are yellow journalists of the worst kind.

[Renauda]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Tulsi Time:

I don't think the shoe is the part of the horse that I would associate him with.

Nor would I.

[Catseye3]

@Renauda said in Tulsi Time:

Then there’s Tulsi and Sanders….but that’s another story.

Tulsi/Sanders vs Trump/Carlson. How's that for a Cocky Horror Show?
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

[Renauda]

@Catseye3

Lol, but I don’t think we want to go there.

Would be bad form.