I ain't goin'
-
Not sure what the solution should be, but allowing someone who is appointed to stay on just because the other side will not vote on a new person doesn't seem right.
Maybe have like jury picking - the other side can reject X number of people without a reason, but at some point, they lose that. LOL
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login