A great way to make policy
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 11:50 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 12:36 last edited by
What is with NY that they keep electing these deeply flawed characters?
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 12:41 last edited by Catseye3
I agree the governor's response is mushy and evasive, but I don't really see the point of the question. Why is that important? Or relevant, even?
-
I agree the governor's response is mushy and evasive, but I don't really see the point of the question. Why is that important? Or relevant, even?
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 12:44 last edited by@Catseye3 said in A great way to make policy:
I agree the governor's response is mushy and evasive, but I don't really see the point of the question. Why is that important? Or relevant, even?
Has to do with the recent SCOTUS ruling on shall issue.
-
@Catseye3 said in A great way to make policy:
I agree the governor's response is mushy and evasive, but I don't really see the point of the question. Why is that important? Or relevant, even?
Has to do with the recent SCOTUS ruling on shall issue.
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 12:45 last edited by@Jolly said in A great way to make policy:
Has to do with the recent SCOTUS ruling on shall issue.
And the badguy on the street cares about this how?
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 13:00 last edited by
He doesn't. And he doesn't have a concealed carry permit either. That's the point - it isn't legal gun owners running around murdering and robbing.
-
He doesn't. And he doesn't have a concealed carry permit either. That's the point - it isn't legal gun owners running around murdering and robbing.
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 13:17 last edited by Mik
Because it forces the pol in question to reveal the depth of her fecklessness. "Facts be damned, my tribe supports this".
-
Because it forces the pol in question to reveal the depth of her fecklessness. "Facts be damned, my tribe supports this".
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 13:55 last edited by
You cannot reduce crime by disarming the law abiding. She herself says she doesn't need any data on that to make a decision.
-
You cannot reduce crime by disarming the law abiding. She herself says she doesn't need any data on that to make a decision.
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 14:00 last edited by@Mik TOTALLY agree. Harry Brown used to say that if you take away guns from law-abiding people then only the unlawful will have guns.
My point was to how pols indulge in their endless palavering during quote-unquote legislative proceedings about stuff that should be wrangled off site, if you will.
But I get your point, that the questioner was trying to force the governor to concede a point. Which, yeah, good luck with that.