Give 'em hell, Neil.
-
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 09:34 last edited by
The one thing that bothers me, maybe a bit unrelated, is the fact that the coach said that no one was required to attend and it didn't matter if they did or not.
In his brain he may think that, but the reality is - if you are member of a team, and the coach says - "I am going to do X. You can join me if you want, but it is not required.", you are probably going to join him, even if you don't agree.
For example, Teams hold "voluntary" workouts all the time. I am pretty sure the coaches know who is going to these "volunteer" workouts and how does not.
When a authority person says something is voluntary, especially when the people under him are teenagers or younger, you can be sure that there is unseen pressure to follow what the coach says.
I don't understand why he would want to put them in that situation. Tough for a kid who disagrees to say no.
-
The one thing that bothers me, maybe a bit unrelated, is the fact that the coach said that no one was required to attend and it didn't matter if they did or not.
In his brain he may think that, but the reality is - if you are member of a team, and the coach says - "I am going to do X. You can join me if you want, but it is not required.", you are probably going to join him, even if you don't agree.
For example, Teams hold "voluntary" workouts all the time. I am pretty sure the coaches know who is going to these "volunteer" workouts and how does not.
When a authority person says something is voluntary, especially when the people under him are teenagers or younger, you can be sure that there is unseen pressure to follow what the coach says.
I don't understand why he would want to put them in that situation. Tough for a kid who disagrees to say no.
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 16:11 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
The one thing that bothers me, maybe a bit unrelated, is the fact that the coach said that no one was required to attend and it didn't matter if they did or not.
In his brain he may think that, but the reality is - if you are member of a team, and the coach says - "I am going to do X. You can join me if you want, but it is not required.", you are probably going to join him, even if you don't agree.
For example, Teams hold "voluntary" workouts all the time. I am pretty sure the coaches know who is going to these "volunteer" workouts and how does not.
When a authority person says something is voluntary, especially when the people under him are teenagers or younger, you can be sure that there is unseen pressure to follow what the coach says.
I don't understand why he would want to put them in that situation. Tough for a kid who disagrees to say no.
You ae responsible for your own actions. If players or anybody else wishes to join him, have at it. If not, don't. That's simple. I think it fairly easy to prove the allegations of playing time, etc.
People are not responsible for other people's actions in such a matter, nor are they responsible for what people may or may not think.
Nobody should live their life walking on eggshells.
-
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 16:15 last edited by
I wonder if Christians will remember Mr Gorsuch’s sage advice when the inevitable satanic prayer occurs on school property.
-
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 16:18 last edited by
Considering that the woke narratives, and in particular the race narrative, is a religion, we've got a much more realistic problem on our hands with teachers teaching religious dogma as fact, in the classroom. Hopefully a CRT case will come before the court, before the court has a progressive majority.
-
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 16:24 last edited by
WDS.
-
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 16:25 last edited by
-
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 17:22 last edited by
After-school Satan club tests the limits of church and state
-
I wonder if Christians will remember Mr Gorsuch’s sage advice when the inevitable satanic prayer occurs on school property.
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 17:48 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
I wonder if Christians will remember Mr Gorsuch’s sage advice when the inevitable satanic prayer occurs on school property.
Oh, we already have the Satan Club at a school in my home town. There was a big fuss about it, but by now I suspect it has died out.
But even if the kid participates to fit in it isn't hurting them.
-
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 18:06 last edited by
This thread got me started thinking about that brouhaha from January. Apparently the first meeting there were two kids, both children of the local Satan Club leaders.
It went to hell in a handbasket.
-
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 18:07 last edited by
Damnation.
-
I wonder if Christians will remember Mr Gorsuch’s sage advice when the inevitable satanic prayer occurs on school property.
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 18:11 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
I wonder if Christians will remember Mr Gorsuch’s sage advice when the inevitable satanic prayer occurs on school property.
I figure they'll remember it at school.
-
I wonder if Christians will remember Mr Gorsuch’s sage advice when the inevitable satanic prayer occurs on school property.
wrote on 29 Jun 2022, 18:36 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
I wonder if Christians will remember Mr Gorsuch’s sage advice when the inevitable satanic prayer occurs on school property.
Well considering the “Satanic Clubs” are not actually sincere expressions of faith and instead are created with the intent to belittle and antagonize… Yeah, let’s see that case taken to court. I would enjoy it.
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 15:50 last edited by
Looks like you’ve already answered my question
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 15:51 last edited by
Having SCOTUS decide what the “real” religions are doesn’t seem very first amendment-y.
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 15:59 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
Having SCOTUS decide what the “real” religions are doesn’t seem very first amendment-y.
SCOTUS doesn't have much of a role in religion. Period.
-
wrote on 30 Jun 2022, 16:28 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
Having SCOTUS decide what the “real” religions are doesn’t seem very first amendment-y.
You're imagining a supreme court judgment which accepts satanism as a true religion, and rejects its practice on school grounds based on separation of church and state?
I don't suppose your local Christians would object to organized Satanism on school grounds based on the principle of church and state separation. They'd probably object based on the principle that satanism is destructive to the social fabric, and all that. Which would eventually run afoul of various laws, one assumes.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
The one thing that bothers me, maybe a bit unrelated, is the fact that the coach said that no one was required to attend and it didn't matter if they did or not.
In his brain he may think that, but the reality is - if you are member of a team, and the coach says - "I am going to do X. You can join me if you want, but it is not required.", you are probably going to join him, even if you don't agree.
For example, Teams hold "voluntary" workouts all the time. I am pretty sure the coaches know who is going to these "volunteer" workouts and how does not.
When a authority person says something is voluntary, especially when the people under him are teenagers or younger, you can be sure that there is unseen pressure to follow what the coach says.
I don't understand why he would want to put them in that situation. Tough for a kid who disagrees to say no.
You ae responsible for your own actions. If players or anybody else wishes to join him, have at it. If not, don't. That's simple. I think it fairly easy to prove the allegations of playing time, etc.
People are not responsible for other people's actions in such a matter, nor are they responsible for what people may or may not think.
Nobody should live their life walking on eggshells.
wrote on 2 Jul 2022, 10:41 last edited by@Jolly said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
@taiwan_girl said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
The one thing that bothers me, maybe a bit unrelated, is the fact that the coach said that no one was required to attend and it didn't matter if they did or not.
In his brain he may think that, but the reality is - if you are member of a team, and the coach says - "I am going to do X. You can join me if you want, but it is not required.", you are probably going to join him, even if you don't agree.
For example, Teams hold "voluntary" workouts all the time. I am pretty sure the coaches know who is going to these "volunteer" workouts and how does not.
When a authority person says something is voluntary, especially when the people under him are teenagers or younger, you can be sure that there is unseen pressure to follow what the coach says.
I don't understand why he would want to put them in that situation. Tough for a kid who disagrees to say no.
You ae responsible for your own actions. If players or anybody else wishes to join him, have at it. If not, don't. That's simple. I think it fairly easy to prove the allegations of playing time, etc.
People are not responsible for other people's actions in such a matter, nor are they responsible for what people may or may not think.
Nobody should live their life walking on eggshells.
Hmmm. Not sure it is that easy. A teenager or below can be swayed by peer pressure. It is a big big thing. And if the authority figure is the one supplying the peer pressure (whether they know it or not), then it is an even higher level.
-
@Jolly said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
@taiwan_girl said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
The one thing that bothers me, maybe a bit unrelated, is the fact that the coach said that no one was required to attend and it didn't matter if they did or not.
In his brain he may think that, but the reality is - if you are member of a team, and the coach says - "I am going to do X. You can join me if you want, but it is not required.", you are probably going to join him, even if you don't agree.
For example, Teams hold "voluntary" workouts all the time. I am pretty sure the coaches know who is going to these "volunteer" workouts and how does not.
When a authority person says something is voluntary, especially when the people under him are teenagers or younger, you can be sure that there is unseen pressure to follow what the coach says.
I don't understand why he would want to put them in that situation. Tough for a kid who disagrees to say no.
You ae responsible for your own actions. If players or anybody else wishes to join him, have at it. If not, don't. That's simple. I think it fairly easy to prove the allegations of playing time, etc.
People are not responsible for other people's actions in such a matter, nor are they responsible for what people may or may not think.
Nobody should live their life walking on eggshells.
Hmmm. Not sure it is that easy. A teenager or below can be swayed by peer pressure. It is a big big thing. And if the authority figure is the one supplying the peer pressure (whether they know it or not), then it is an even higher level.
wrote on 2 Jul 2022, 12:18 last edited by Jolly 7 Feb 2022, 12:24@taiwan_girl said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
@Jolly said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
@taiwan_girl said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
The one thing that bothers me, maybe a bit unrelated, is the fact that the coach said that no one was required to attend and it didn't matter if they did or not.
In his brain he may think that, but the reality is - if you are member of a team, and the coach says - "I am going to do X. You can join me if you want, but it is not required.", you are probably going to join him, even if you don't agree.
For example, Teams hold "voluntary" workouts all the time. I am pretty sure the coaches know who is going to these "volunteer" workouts and how does not.
When a authority person says something is voluntary, especially when the people under him are teenagers or younger, you can be sure that there is unseen pressure to follow what the coach says.
I don't understand why he would want to put them in that situation. Tough for a kid who disagrees to say no.
You ae responsible for your own actions. If players or anybody else wishes to join him, have at it. If not, don't. That's simple. I think it fairly easy to prove the allegations of playing time, etc.
People are not responsible for other people's actions in such a matter, nor are they responsible for what people may or may not think.
Nobody should live their life walking on eggshells.
Hmmm. Not sure it is that easy. A teenager or below can be swayed by peer pressure. It is a big big thing. And if the authority figure is the one supplying the peer pressure (whether they know it or not), then it is an even higher level.
Well then, sugar, let us not have any authority figure do anything. Ever. Wouldn't want to impact those little minds of mush, would we?
If the parents of the kids he coaches or the parents of the students he teaches or rubs elbows with have reservations or just plain dislike about a man praying on a football field, let them instruct and educate their children why they think the prayer is wrong and why they should not participate.
Nobody is forcing them to join him. Nobody. And as long as there are no repercussions for not joining him - and there hasn't been, or that would have come out in court - then kwitcherbitchin.
High school football, even though the average player is not as big or fast as in college (and certainly not the pros) is a violent game. Guys get slobber-knocked on occasion. Knees get torn up, ankles sprained, myriad bones are broken and guys get concussed. Way back when dinosaurs roamed the earth and I played with a leather helmet (not really, I'm not quite that old), I've had a knee screwed up, a broken arm and was hospitalized with a concussion (but you should have seen the other guy
), but even in a game where I had no injuries, I'd wake up the next morning so stiff I could barely walk, with bruises all over.Nobody come and jerks you up from your desk and makes you suit up and head out to the football field. Guys play because they want to. In many ways, it's a wonderful game. It teaches a high level of teamwork, more than most other sports. All eleven guys have to do their job, or a play goes for minimal gains or is a bust. On the other side, are eleven guys trying to do their jobs perfectly, to ensure the play is for a loss or no gain. There are games within games...stretch blocks, zone blocks, whams, G-pulls, influence blocks, gap calls, snap changes, audibles, silent counts, pocket switch-offs...and that's just a few things on the offensive line.
It's also a game that pushes your physical limits and makes you perform, even when you're exhausted. You reach down and find something that let's you continue, even when you can't. It teaches you can do more than you thought you were capable of doing. The game has a beginning and an end, with those who can grit their teeth in the fourth quarter, often emerging with victory, simply because they want it more than the players across the ball from them.
So it's a great game, but a complicated game and never forget - a violent game. Even unto paralysis or death. The guys who play, know that going in. It's all on the waiver you sign acknowledging the danger of the sport. Ever notice at a high school, college or pro game, when some guy gets pilayed out on the field, he's not moving and they've sent for the cart, players (even from opposing teams) are kneeling on the field and praying for the injured player to be all right?
You want to take that away, too? Afraid it might influence some youngster the way you don't want them influenced?
Personally, when I'm hurt, and you've got that numb feeling before the pain washes over you and you don't know what's broken or badly injured, I wouldn't mind a few prayers. Not at all.
And if a high school football coach wishes to pray out loud on his knees after a game to a benevolent God, thanking him for no serious injuries or praying for those were injured, it's not a bad thing.
-
@Jolly said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
@taiwan_girl said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
The one thing that bothers me, maybe a bit unrelated, is the fact that the coach said that no one was required to attend and it didn't matter if they did or not.
In his brain he may think that, but the reality is - if you are member of a team, and the coach says - "I am going to do X. You can join me if you want, but it is not required.", you are probably going to join him, even if you don't agree.
For example, Teams hold "voluntary" workouts all the time. I am pretty sure the coaches know who is going to these "volunteer" workouts and how does not.
When a authority person says something is voluntary, especially when the people under him are teenagers or younger, you can be sure that there is unseen pressure to follow what the coach says.
I don't understand why he would want to put them in that situation. Tough for a kid who disagrees to say no.
You ae responsible for your own actions. If players or anybody else wishes to join him, have at it. If not, don't. That's simple. I think it fairly easy to prove the allegations of playing time, etc.
People are not responsible for other people's actions in such a matter, nor are they responsible for what people may or may not think.
Nobody should live their life walking on eggshells.
Hmmm. Not sure it is that easy. A teenager or below can be swayed by peer pressure. It is a big big thing. And if the authority figure is the one supplying the peer pressure (whether they know it or not), then it is an even higher level.
wrote on 2 Jul 2022, 13:13 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
@Jolly said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
@taiwan_girl said in Give 'em hell, Neil.:
The one thing that bothers me, maybe a bit unrelated, is the fact that the coach said that no one was required to attend and it didn't matter if they did or not.
In his brain he may think that, but the reality is - if you are member of a team, and the coach says - "I am going to do X. You can join me if you want, but it is not required.", you are probably going to join him, even if you don't agree.
For example, Teams hold "voluntary" workouts all the time. I am pretty sure the coaches know who is going to these "volunteer" workouts and how does not.
When a authority person says something is voluntary, especially when the people under him are teenagers or younger, you can be sure that there is unseen pressure to follow what the coach says.
I don't understand why he would want to put them in that situation. Tough for a kid who disagrees to say no.
You ae responsible for your own actions. If players or anybody else wishes to join him, have at it. If not, don't. That's simple. I think it fairly easy to prove the allegations of playing time, etc.
People are not responsible for other people's actions in such a matter, nor are they responsible for what people may or may not think.
Nobody should live their life walking on eggshells.
Hmmm. Not sure it is that easy. A teenager or below can be swayed by peer pressure. It is a big big thing. And if the authority figure is the one supplying the peer pressure (whether they know it or not), then it is an even higher level.
So what? How is that kid harmed by kneeling down and shutting his eyes for a few seconds? I've done it many, many times not out of any religious faith just out of respect for those I am associating with. There are times to take a stand, and times to just shut up and respect the views of others. It's part of civil society.
