An Airfield Too Far
-
Comparative analysis of failed Arnhem Campaign 1944 and recent Russian attempt to take Antonov Airfield near Kyiv in March:
https://mwi.usma.edu/an-airfield-too-far-failures-at-market-garden-and-antonov-airfield/
-
I think it was wishful thinking. By beginning of September 1944, the USSR was just beginning to move into occupied Poland and the Red Army supply lines were beginning to over extend. The Nazis while in retreat still had a lot of fight left in them and continued to counter attack whenever possible. Hitler and his inner circle still believed they could hold off both fronts. Having said that though, the invasion of Germany could have taken place earlier but just not at Arnhem but further south and under the command of generals like Devers, Bradley and Patton. Whether the war would have been over by Christmas though remains doubtful given the Nazi apocalyptic mindset.
I think that Arnhem was ill conceived - the most vociferous opposition to it came from the free Dutch who knew the terrain and understood that the armoured column would be severely limited in its mobility to the existing roads. There is also the failure of the command structure to accept its own intelligence reports regarding the German positions. Much of the blame rests solely on Monty and Boy Brown who pushed through the plan regardless of the information in front of them. It could well have been politics that governed the decision to proceed. If so it would be another example of why politics has no place at the tactical level in war.
Elbows up!
-
I think it was wishful thinking. By beginning of September 1944, the USSR was just beginning to move into occupied Poland and the Red Army supply lines were beginning to over extend. The Nazis while in retreat still had a lot of fight left in them and continued to counter attack whenever possible. Hitler and his inner circle still believed they could hold off both fronts. Having said that though, the invasion of Germany could have taken place earlier but just not at Arnhem but further south and under the command of generals like Devers, Bradley and Patton. Whether the war would have been over by Christmas though remains doubtful given the Nazi apocalyptic mindset.
I think that Arnhem was ill conceived - the most vociferous opposition to it came from the free Dutch who knew the terrain and understood that the armoured column would be severely limited in its mobility to the existing roads. There is also the failure of the command structure to accept its own intelligence reports regarding the German positions. Much of the blame rests solely on Monty and Boy Brown who pushed through the plan regardless of the information in front of them. It could well have been politics that governed the decision to proceed. If so it would be another example of why politics has no place at the tactical level in war.
@Renauda said in An Airfield Too Far:
Much of the blame rests solely on Monty and Boy Brown who pushed through the plan regardless of the information in front of them. It could well have been politics that governed the decision to proceed. If so it would be another example of why politics has no place at the tactical level in war.
Yeah, I think that's accurate. And yes, the Dutch certainly (and rightly) had their doubts.
-
I think it was wishful thinking. By beginning of September 1944, the USSR was just beginning to move into occupied Poland and the Red Army supply lines were beginning to over extend. The Nazis while in retreat still had a lot of fight left in them and continued to counter attack whenever possible. Hitler and his inner circle still believed they could hold off both fronts. Having said that though, the invasion of Germany could have taken place earlier but just not at Arnhem but further south and under the command of generals like Devers, Bradley and Patton. Whether the war would have been over by Christmas though remains doubtful given the Nazi apocalyptic mindset.
I think that Arnhem was ill conceived - the most vociferous opposition to it came from the free Dutch who knew the terrain and understood that the armoured column would be severely limited in its mobility to the existing roads. There is also the failure of the command structure to accept its own intelligence reports regarding the German positions. Much of the blame rests solely on Monty and Boy Brown who pushed through the plan regardless of the information in front of them. It could well have been politics that governed the decision to proceed. If so it would be another example of why politics has no place at the tactical level in war.
@Renauda said in An Airfield Too Far:
It could well have been politics that governed the decision to proceed. If so it would be another example of why politics has no place at the tactical level in war.
Amen.
