When Judges Lie...
-
Missed the point again, didn't you?
-
As Douglas Murray points out, the effect of this fictitious narrative is that this allegedly rhetorical spin is taken as fact by the virtuous masses. And those virtuous masses then tribe up with others who care about this cop perpetrated genocide, and the rest becomes voting history. Witness the power of propaganda. Ax, please name a lie propagated by the conservative establishment that is so widely accepted and so powerful at the voting booth. I reject the notion that both sides are equally divorced from reality.
-
@Mik said in When Judges Lie...:
She has no business on any bench. If you cannot answer straight up question about your own past statements...
It’s interesting how her way of answering those questions is indistinguishable from the way a politician answers questions. But that’s what the left wants. Ideologues with lawyerly credentials. Imagine, we’re at a place where it’s actually normal that a federal judge would also be an outspoken advocate for the left’s most important political narrative. One that happens to be completely dishonest and destructive to society, all in the service of the status seeking ambitions of the crafters of the message. Such as this woman.