Libs of TikTok
-
East Germany would have wet dreams over what libs have been doing with the internet.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Libs of TikTok:
East Germany would have wet dreams over what libs have been doing with the internet.
It’s awesome for public self-selection, as the douches proudly self-identify. Righteous people are always self-awareness-free as they display their worst tendencies in the name of their socially advantageous mob morality.
-
As I read the WaPo piece they seem to be blowing the account all out of proportion.
I don't follow it, I only see occasional retweets but almost everything I've seen is just exposing hypocritical tweets by usually no-name people.
Maybe I've missed something.
@jon-nyc said in Libs of TikTok:
I don't follow it, I only see occasional retweets but almost everything I've seen is just exposing hypocritical tweets by usually no-name people.
Nor do I. However, Libs of TikTok don't so much expose hypocrisy as the absolute craziness that's out there. "Defiant L's" was all about exposing hypocrisy.
But, speaking of hypocrisy, the absolute BALLS of Lorenz to get all weepy in an interview about doxxing and bullying, and then run this story is astonishing.
-
@jon-nyc said in Libs of TikTok:
I don't follow it, I only see occasional retweets but almost everything I've seen is just exposing hypocritical tweets by usually no-name people.
Nor do I. However, Libs of TikTok don't so much expose hypocrisy as the absolute craziness that's out there. "Defiant L's" was all about exposing hypocrisy.
But, speaking of hypocrisy, the absolute BALLS of Lorenz to get all weepy in an interview about doxxing and bullying, and then run this story is astonishing.
@George-K said in Libs of TikTok:
@jon-nyc said in Libs of TikTok:
I don't follow it, I only see occasional retweets but almost everything I've seen is just exposing hypocritical tweets by usually no-name people.
Nor do I. However, Libs of TikTok don't so much expose hypocrisy as the absolute craziness that's out there. "Defiant L's" was all about exposing hypocrisy.
But, speaking of hypocrisy, the absolute BALLS of Lorenz to get all weepy in an interview about doxxing and bullying, and then run this story is astonishing.
Literally the purpose of the emotion of righteousness is to blind oneself to these sorts of hypocrisies. It’s not so much balls as a lack of self awareness, brought to you by millions of years of evolution.
-
@jon-nyc said in Libs of TikTok:
I don't follow it, I only see occasional retweets but almost everything I've seen is just exposing hypocritical tweets by usually no-name people.
Nor do I. However, Libs of TikTok don't so much expose hypocrisy as the absolute craziness that's out there. "Defiant L's" was all about exposing hypocrisy.
But, speaking of hypocrisy, the absolute BALLS of Lorenz to get all weepy in an interview about doxxing and bullying, and then run this story is astonishing.
-
@George-K said in Libs of TikTok:
"Defiant L's" was all about exposing hypocrisy.
Yes that’s the one I was thinking of. They find some rando who said x in 2017 and ~x today. He must put a lot of effort into that.
-
For those who don't know @libsoftiktok is a twitter account that is run by an anonymous woman. The account takes videos, posts, and pictures of some of the outrageous things posted on twitter and elsewhere by some of the most deranged people on the planet. It offers a bit of commentary, but lets the posts speak for themselves.
So, apparently the "media reporter" of (Democracy in Darkness) billionaire Jeff Bezos' newspaper had a meltdown about how unfair it is to dox people, how privacy should be respected, etc. A month ago, she gave an interview and wept about it.
It's "terrifying." It's "horrifying".
Link to videoOf course, that was then.
And, this morning, someone showed up at libs of TikTok's relatives house for an interview.
-
Democracy dies in the lies of newspapers.
-
They published her name - again. That's about as personal as you can get.
-
They published (and then stealth-edited) her real-estate license, which had her address.
The fact that they edited it is an admission that they broke standards, and they only did it after being called out on it. Secondly, what does her real-estate business have to do with her politics?
Perhaps I can go to DC and ask one of Ms. Lorenz's relatives what they think about that. Gotta find the address, however. I'm sure I can find the information somewhere.
-
-
Give 'em hell, Tucker!
Link to video -
Democracy dies in the lies of newspapers.
-
They published her name - again. That's about as personal as you can get.
-
They published (and then stealth-edited) her real-estate license, which had her address.
The fact that they edited it is an admission that they broke standards, and they only did it after being called out on it. Secondly, what does her real-estate business have to do with her politics?
Perhaps I can go to DC and ask one of Ms. Lorenz's relatives what they think about that. Gotta find the address, however. I'm sure I can find the information somewhere.
The fact that they edited it is an admission that they broke standards, and they only did it after being called out on it. Secondly, what does her real-estate business have to do with her politics?
Perhaps I can go to DC and ask one of Ms. Lorenz's relatives what they think about that. Gotta find the address, however. I'm sure I can find the information somewhere.
Taylor Lorenz, who still works at the Washington Post, is a horrible person and a liar.
-
-
Libs of TIkTok cancelled, again.
Twitter has suspended me again for "hateful conduct"
Yet no specific tweets were flagged as being in violation of Twitter's rules.Once again, I have received a wrongful 7-day suspension as the result of a targeted harassment campaign from the Left to deplatform me. In response, we sent another letter to Twitter putting them on notice that we will sue them if they permanently suspend my account.
Twitter claims I have violated their “hateful conduct policy,” but like my last suspension, they have provided no explanation as to how I violated this policy. Was it hateful to expose an all-ages drag show where a stripper performed in front of children? Was it hateful to expose a drag queen who allowed a small child to repeatedly rub their crotch?
Was it hateful to expose Dr. Katherine Gast for openly stating that she “will operate on minors” for gender-affirming surgery?
The truth is I haven’t engaged in hateful conduct. I’ve just exposed the Left’s depravity by reporting the facts. There’s no rule against that, so they have to make up violations I’ve never committed.