The darling of Russian state TV
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 11:27 last edited by
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 12:34 last edited by Klaus
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 12:38 last edited by George K
@Klaus said in The darling of Russian state TV:
But now she seems to have lost her mind completely.
She really has gone off the rails, hasn't she? You should see her "thoughts" on the pandemic and vaccinations.
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 12:45 last edited by Doctor Phibes
I always thought she was stupid.
Just sayin'.
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 12:58 last edited by
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media. Nobody believes me, but a few years back it was very late at night (2:30-3:30) and I had woken up for some reason and couldn’t fall back asleep. So I went downstairs and was just flipping through the news channels when this bizarre pro-Russia PSA was on proclaiming the wonders and glories of Russia. The commercial/PSA ended and it immediately went into the news, but the anchor was the same voice that had just did the psa piece. The channel? OAN. I have tried to find that spot since then, and tried researching connections. The Mrs. was consuming a lot of conservative media back then and I told her about it and to avoid OAN, but she didn’t believe me and thinks I dreamt it.
-
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media. Nobody believes me, but a few years back it was very late at night (2:30-3:30) and I had woken up for some reason and couldn’t fall back asleep. So I went downstairs and was just flipping through the news channels when this bizarre pro-Russia PSA was on proclaiming the wonders and glories of Russia. The commercial/PSA ended and it immediately went into the news, but the anchor was the same voice that had just did the psa piece. The channel? OAN. I have tried to find that spot since then, and tried researching connections. The Mrs. was consuming a lot of conservative media back then and I told her about it and to avoid OAN, but she didn’t believe me and thinks I dreamt it.
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 13:20 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Either money's involved, or they're cretins, or they're not actually conservatives. Or maybe all three.
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 13:21 last edited by
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 13:50 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in The darling of Russian state TV:
What's that, about 5% of Republican reps?
Maybe that guy had a point.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Either money's involved, or they're cretins, or they're not actually conservatives. Or maybe all three.
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 15:41 last edited byEither money's involved, or they're cretins, or they're not actually conservatives. Or maybe all three..
I won’t speculate here on the first two possibilities. I am however convinced of the third. For quite some time as a matter of fact.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Either money's involved, or they're cretins, or they're not actually conservatives. Or maybe all three.
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 15:58 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Indeed, the intellectual conservatives should recognize that lots of what the Putin regime does is at odds with conservatism. But the emotional self-proclaimed “conservatives” seem more easily taken in by Putin’s manufactured “strong man” propaganda, more ready to accept unilaterally taking another country by force as a sign of “genius,” well, as long as said “genius” wraps himself in some form of Christian whiteness.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Indeed, the intellectual conservatives should recognize that lots of what the Putin regime does is at odds with conservatism. But the emotional self-proclaimed “conservatives” seem more easily taken in by Putin’s manufactured “strong man” propaganda, more ready to accept unilaterally taking another country by force as a sign of “genius,” well, as long as said “genius” wraps himself in some form of Christian whiteness.
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 16:00 last edited by@Axtremus said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Doctor-Phibes said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Indeed, the intellectual conservatives should recognize that lots of what the Putin regime does is at odds with conservatism. But the emotional self-proclaimed “conservatives” seem more easily taken in by Putin’s manufactured “strong man” propaganda, more ready to accept unilaterally taking another country by force as a sign of “genius,” well, as long as said “genius” wraps himself in some form of Christian whiteness.
So, the west by and large cares about Ukraine because Ukraine is mostly white, except for the faux conservatives who care about Russia, because Russia is mostly white. Yes, that checks out as the worldview of lefties vis a vis racism being the root cause of everything wrong.
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 16:08 last edited by
I really haven't been paying too much attention to the "Carlson is a Putin fan" controversy, such as it is.
Can someone point me to a tl;dr summary of the pro-Russia pro-Putin things he's said?
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 16:13 last edited by
There are video compilations all over.
-
@Axtremus said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Doctor-Phibes said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Indeed, the intellectual conservatives should recognize that lots of what the Putin regime does is at odds with conservatism. But the emotional self-proclaimed “conservatives” seem more easily taken in by Putin’s manufactured “strong man” propaganda, more ready to accept unilaterally taking another country by force as a sign of “genius,” well, as long as said “genius” wraps himself in some form of Christian whiteness.
So, the west by and large cares about Ukraine because Ukraine is mostly white, except for the faux conservatives who care about Russia, because Russia is mostly white. Yes, that checks out as the worldview of lefties vis a vis racism being the root cause of everything wrong.
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 16:15 last edited by@Horace said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Axtremus said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Doctor-Phibes said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Indeed, the intellectual conservatives should recognize that lots of what the Putin regime does is at odds with conservatism. But the emotional self-proclaimed “conservatives” seem more easily taken in by Putin’s manufactured “strong man” propaganda, more ready to accept unilaterally taking another country by force as a sign of “genius,” well, as long as said “genius” wraps himself in some form of Christian whiteness.
So, the west by and large cares about Ukraine because Ukraine is mostly white, except for the faux conservatives who care about Russia, because Russia is mostly white. Yes, that checks out as the worldview of lefties vis a vis racism being the root cause of everything wrong.
The faux conservatives first seems to be attracted to Putin’s “strong man” persona. But Putin is not the only autocrat to project a “strong man” persona, so why the faux conservatives are not similarly attracted to other “strong man” personae? The differentiator may well be that Putin is white wraps himself in Christianity (the Russian Orthodox Church) while the other “strong man” personae (e.g., Erdogan, Duterte, Kim) is not, cannot, or do not. Call it intersectionalism, these emotional conservatives seem attracted to “white Christian strongmen.”
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 16:19 last edited by
@Axtremus said in The darling of Russian state TV:
The faux conservatives first seems to be attracted to Putin’s “strong man” persona. But Putin is not the only autocrat to project a “strong man” persona, so why the faux conservatives are not similarly attracted to other “strong man” personae? The differentiator may well be that Putin is white wraps himself in Christianity (the Russian Orthodox Church) while the other “strong man” personae (e.g., Erdogan, Duterte, Kim) is not, cannot, or do not. Call it intersectionalism, these emotional conservatives seem attracted to “white Christian strongmen.”
Maybe they simply like topless men on horses.
Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course.
-
I really haven't been paying too much attention to the "Carlson is a Putin fan" controversy, such as it is.
Can someone point me to a tl;dr summary of the pro-Russia pro-Putin things he's said?
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 16:22 last edited by@George-K said in The darling of Russian state TV:
summary of the pro-Russia pro-Putin things he's said?
According to the big headline in wapo he urged people to ask the question, "Why do I hate Putin?"
Nobody should be allowed to ask this question.
-
@Horace said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Axtremus said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Doctor-Phibes said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Indeed, the intellectual conservatives should recognize that lots of what the Putin regime does is at odds with conservatism. But the emotional self-proclaimed “conservatives” seem more easily taken in by Putin’s manufactured “strong man” propaganda, more ready to accept unilaterally taking another country by force as a sign of “genius,” well, as long as said “genius” wraps himself in some form of Christian whiteness.
So, the west by and large cares about Ukraine because Ukraine is mostly white, except for the faux conservatives who care about Russia, because Russia is mostly white. Yes, that checks out as the worldview of lefties vis a vis racism being the root cause of everything wrong.
The faux conservatives first seems to be attracted to Putin’s “strong man” persona. But Putin is not the only autocrat to project a “strong man” persona, so why the faux conservatives are not similarly attracted to other “strong man” personae? The differentiator may well be that Putin is white wraps himself in Christianity (the Russian Orthodox Church) while the other “strong man” personae (e.g., Erdogan, Duterte, Kim) is not, cannot, or do not. Call it intersectionalism, these emotional conservatives seem attracted to “white Christian strongmen.”
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 16:25 last edited by@Axtremus said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Horace said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Axtremus said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Doctor-Phibes said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Indeed, the intellectual conservatives should recognize that lots of what the Putin regime does is at odds with conservatism. But the emotional self-proclaimed “conservatives” seem more easily taken in by Putin’s manufactured “strong man” propaganda, more ready to accept unilaterally taking another country by force as a sign of “genius,” well, as long as said “genius” wraps himself in some form of Christian whiteness.
So, the west by and large cares about Ukraine because Ukraine is mostly white, except for the faux conservatives who care about Russia, because Russia is mostly white. Yes, that checks out as the worldview of lefties vis a vis racism being the root cause of everything wrong.
The faux conservatives first seems to be attracted to Putin’s “strong man” persona. But Putin is not the only autocrat to project a “strong man” persona, so why the faux conservatives are not similarly attracted to other “strong man” personae? The differentiator may well be that Putin is white wraps himself in Christianity (the Russian Orthodox Church) while the other “strong man” personae (e.g., Erdogan, Duterte, Kim) is not, cannot, or do not. Call it intersectionalism, these emotional conservatives seem attracted to “white Christian strongmen.”
Clearly all situations are identical but for skin color. This is controlled scientific proof of racism being the fundamental factor of not only American politics but all of world politics. Yes, that checks out as the lefty worldview.
-
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 16:25 last edited by
Here’s a compilation from media matters, annoyingly interspersed with war footage.
But you’ll get an idea. He full on said numerous times he supports Russia in the conflict.
Hence the quote from Frum I quoted when he backtracked.
Link to video"You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
-Cormac McCarthy -
Here’s a compilation from media matters, annoyingly interspersed with war footage.
But you’ll get an idea. He full on said numerous times he supports Russia in the conflict.
Hence the quote from Frum I quoted when he backtracked.
Link to videowrote on 18 Mar 2022, 16:29 last edited by@jon-nyc said in The darling of Russian state TV:
Here’s a compilation from media matters, annoyingly interspersed with war footage.
But you’ll get an idea. He full on said numerous times he supports Russia in the conflict.
Hence the quote from Frum I quoted when he backtracked.
Link to videoTucker doesn't care about children with cancer.
-
@Horace said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Axtremus said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@Doctor-Phibes said in The darling of Russian state TV:
@LuFins-Dad said in The darling of Russian state TV:
There has been a weird and strong influence by the Russians in some areas of Conservative media.
It doesn't make any sense at all for "conservatives" to be fans of this Russian regime. It's completely at odds with what they're supposed to stand for.
Indeed, the intellectual conservatives should recognize that lots of what the Putin regime does is at odds with conservatism. But the emotional self-proclaimed “conservatives” seem more easily taken in by Putin’s manufactured “strong man” propaganda, more ready to accept unilaterally taking another country by force as a sign of “genius,” well, as long as said “genius” wraps himself in some form of Christian whiteness.
So, the west by and large cares about Ukraine because Ukraine is mostly white, except for the faux conservatives who care about Russia, because Russia is mostly white. Yes, that checks out as the worldview of lefties vis a vis racism being the root cause of everything wrong.
The faux conservatives first seems to be attracted to Putin’s “strong man” persona. But Putin is not the only autocrat to project a “strong man” persona, so why the faux conservatives are not similarly attracted to other “strong man” personae? The differentiator may well be that Putin is white wraps himself in Christianity (the Russian Orthodox Church) while the other “strong man” personae (e.g., Erdogan, Duterte, Kim) is not, cannot, or do not. Call it intersectionalism, these emotional conservatives seem attracted to “white Christian strongmen.”
wrote on 18 Mar 2022, 16:29 last edited byThe differentiator may well be that Putin is white wraps himself in Christianity (the Russian Orthodox Church)
Yes, the dickhead was quoting scripture at his Nuremberg rally today in Moscow glorifying the Russian seizure and annexation of Crimea eight years ago. It was truly repulsive.
