Hacking The White House

[Jolly]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-campaign-paid-infiltrate-trump-tower-white-house-servers

[George K]

https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/14845/durham

[Improviso]

Makes ya wonder what was in those 33,000+ deleted e-mails, huh?

But I repeat myself.

[George K]

https://www.scribd.com/document/558517708/558443477-Us-v-Sussmann-Government-s-Motion-to-Inquire-Into-Potential-Conflicts-of-Interest

[George K]

This discussion was in the context of "wiretapping," so there's a distinction. But not much difference.

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/the_new_coffee_room/trump-doubles-down-t102247.html

@Axtremus

Sen. Linsey Graham is already comparing it to Watergate:

http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2017/ ... watergate/

@jon-nyc :

Comey weighs in

[George K]

Kinda funny looking at the front page of websites:

I dunno. A law firm hired by a political campaign enlists a tech firm under contract to the White House to spy on White house would be a big story, wouldn't it?

A law form, hired by a political campaign tries to spy on opponent's campaign, and his home would be a big story, wouldn't it?

[Improviso]

@george-k said in Hacking The White House:

I dunno. A law firm hired by a political campaign enlists a tech firm under contract to the White House to spy on White house would be a big story, wouldn't it?
A law form, hired by a political campaign tries to spy on opponent's campaign, and his home would be a big story, wouldn't it?

You would think so....

[George K]

Comments on Ann Althouse's blog:

She's Nixon!

"She's Nixon!"

Nixon was prettier and more likeable.

[George K]

Bad timing. Very bad timing.

[George K]

"In darkness...."

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&as_q=durham&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=washingtonpost.com&as_occt=any&safe=images&as_filetype=&tbs=

https://www.google.com/search?q=durham+site%3Anytimes.com&lr=&safe=images&hl=en&as_qdr=all&sxsrf=APq-WBtoYbx8vyGVJAWsw9vXpomQBGX53A%3A1644777894955&ei=plEJYu7kOdOYptQP7M-k6Ac&ved=0ahUKEwjuz6aRq_31AhVTjIkEHewnCX0Q4dUDCA0&uact=5&oq=durham+site%3Anytimes.com&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6BwgAEEcQsANKBAhBGABKBAhGGABQhwlYzR1gzh9oAXABeACAAW-IAfwHkgEDNy40mAEAoAEByAEIwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz

https://www.google.com/search?q=durham+site%3Amsnbc.com&lr=&safe=images&hl=en&as_qdr=all&sxsrf=APq-WBu1EfnA3urZJh1hz3du-zGu18qAuQ%3A1644777979642&ei=-1EJYsHJJpedptQPtvu2sAQ&ved=0ahUKEwiBs9e5q_31AhWXjokEHba9DUYQ4dUDCA0&uact=5&oq=durham+site%3Amsnbc.com&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6BwgAEEcQsANKBAhBGABKBAhGGABQywVY4R9guiFoA3ABeACAAXiIAegIkgEDNS42mAEAoAEByAEIwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz

[Jolly]

Gee, I feel manipulated.

[Improviso]

Link to video

[George K]

@improviso this isn't at ALL like Watergate.

Here are the important differences that everyone's ignoring.

1. Hillary was not president.
2. Hillary is a woman.
3. No "plumbers" were involved, it was IT guys.
4. It was a Democrats' operation.
5. No emails tapes were destroyed.