We could have had the TPP
-
But instead, we are now watching from the sideline.
WASHINGTON—China joins U.S. allies including Japan and Australia in a new Asia-Pacific trade agreement that launches Saturday—with the U.S. watching from the sidelines.
The new Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or RCEP, will eventually eliminate more than 90% of tariffs on commerce among its 15 member countries, in what economists say will be a boon to trade in the region.
.... -
I talked about this pact before. While there may have been some reasons not to like the original TPP, pulling out has really left us on the sidelines in Asia trade.

-
Dems and Republicans both slunk away from this one for political expedience.
The pact was designed to specifically exclude China, if I recall correctly.
@xenon said in We could have had the TPP:
Dems and Republicans both slunk away from this one for political expedience.
The pact was designed to specifically exclude China, if I recall correctly.
Correct. A lot of countries in Asia (specifically in SE Asia) put a lot of effort and negotiations into the original trade agreement, with the understanding that this would ensure that the US was in agreement.
I am "acquainted" with some people on the other side who were setting the groundwork for this. Lots of disappointment when we pulled out.
-
@jolly We need more Asian trade ex-China.
Our trade with China is about 2.5x our trade of all SE Asian countries combined. The TPP would have helped to work on this imbalance.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login