Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Amazon Complains

Amazon Complains

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
12 Posts 4 Posters 110 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t compete, SpaceX says

    Amazon's attempt to block proposals for the next-generation Starlink system is a "delay tactic" and a continuation of Amazon's strategy of "hinder[ing] competitors to compensate for Amazon's failure to make progress of its own," SpaceX told the Federal Communications Commission yesterday.

    "Amazon's track record amply demonstrates that as it falls behind competitors, it is more than willing to use regulatory and legal processes to create obstacles designed to delay those competitors from leaving Amazon even further behind," SpaceX told the FCC in its filing. Approving Amazon's request would hurt consumers by denying them "access to faster-moving competition," SpaceX said.

    Amazon last week urged the FCC to reject an update to SpaceX's Starlink plan because it "proposes two different configurations for the nearly 30,000 satellites of its Gen2 System, each of which arranges these satellites along very different orbital parameters." Amazon contends that the SpaceX request violates a rule requiring applications to be complete and have no internal inconsistencies.

    Amazon's request would prevent the commission from seeking public comment on SpaceX's application, SpaceX said. "The commission should recognize this gambit for the obstructionist tactic that it is, reject Amazon's request, and quickly put the amendment out for public comment," SpaceX said. The public-comment process will allow "any issues [to] be fully vetted," SpaceX said.

    Amazon's Kuiper Systems subsidiary plans to eventually launch low Earth orbit satellites to compete against SpaceX's Starlink division. But while SpaceX is providing beta service to over 100,000 customers from over 1,700 satellites, Amazon has said it won't start launching any satellites until at least 2023.

    SpaceX comments:

    The commission issued an order in July 2020 informing Amazon that it had not provided sufficient information about how its proposed system would protect others from interference or meet the commission's rules for orbital debris. But while Amazon has filed nothing with the commission to address these conditions on its own license for nearly 400 days, it took only 4 days to object to SpaceX's next-generation NGSO system. In fact, Amazon has not had a single meeting with the commission this year about how it intends to resolve the commission's interference or safety concerns, but it has had 15 meetings in that same span just about SpaceX. While Amazon has waited 15 months to explain how its system works, it has lodged objections to SpaceX on average about every 16 days this year

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      They can complain, but they have no grounds to do so.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Offline
        MikM Offline
        Mik
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        It's a hail mary.

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Mik

          It's a hail mary.

          George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @mik said in Amazon Complains:

          It's a hail mary.

          It's lawfare.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Loser pays.

            It's the only answer.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I don't know about loser pays all around, but if the plaintiff fails to prove their case......

              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

              1 Reply Last reply
              • AxtremusA Away
                AxtremusA Away
                Axtremus
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @jolly said in Amazon Complains:

                Loser pays.

                It's the only answer.

                That stance of yours extends also to lawsuits that claim “voter fraud” and “election irregularities”, right?

                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Yep.

                  Voter fraud is easy to prove. There were multiple examples of it.

                  Now, while we're at it, let's fix it. One man, one vote, in person. must have ID to vote, no provisional ballots. No mail-in ballots, except for soldiers serving overseas and other government personnel. Early voting begins 24 days before the election. All polling places will be subject to monitor by every party with a person on the ballot.

                  See how easy this is?

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    Yep.

                    Voter fraud is easy to prove. There were multiple examples of it.

                    Now, while we're at it, let's fix it. One man, one vote, in person. must have ID to vote, no provisional ballots. No mail-in ballots, except for soldiers serving overseas and other government personnel. Early voting begins 24 days before the election. All polling places will be subject to monitor by every party with a person on the ballot.

                    See how easy this is?

                    AxtremusA Away
                    AxtremusA Away
                    Axtremus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @jolly said in Amazon Complains:

                    Voter fraud is easy to prove.

                    Yet Trump’s Kraken brigade batted less than 1 in 60 with their voter fraud lawsuits. They should pay all the legal costs involved, including those incurred by the defendants they named in their lawsuits.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by Jolly
                      #10

                      Voter fraud is like pregnancy, you either is or you ain't.

                      I see you're in favor of fraud.

                      You should be ashamed of yourself.

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • MikM Offline
                        MikM Offline
                        Mik
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        It would be much easier to prove with voter id.

                        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • AxtremusA Away
                          AxtremusA Away
                          Axtremus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Loser pays …

                          https://www.reuters.com/world/us/michigan-officials-demand-payment-legal-fees-ex-trump-campaign-lawyer-powell-2021-09-08/

                          Michigan demands ex-Trump campaign lawyer reimburse $22,000 in legal fees

                          WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Michigan on Wednesday demanded that lawyers who unsuccessfully sued to overturn former President Donald Trump’s election defeat reimburse the state $22,000 for legal costs, and the City of Detroit was preparing a claim expected to be far higher.
                          …

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups