Nunes: Criminal Referrals Coming

[xenon]

So that thread brings up the grey area here.

The first part of the thread asserts the following:

Van Grack told Judge Sullivan that the Flynn “lies” "impeded" and "had a material impact on" the Trump/Russia investigation.

Flynn was already under investigation on the whole counterintelligence thing. They were going to close up the investigation, because they found nothing material.

Then this whole Kislyak thing happens and Stzrok comments that it was “serendipitously good” and “our utter incompetence actually helps us.” - because the investigation hadn't been close. McCabe reportedly acted with “surprise and relief"

Now the DOJ's argument is that Flynn can make false statements to the FBI, that's not a crime - but there was no investigative basis for it (I'm assuming that means the original probe). That's why it needs to be thrown out.

Now - let me say. I'm no lawyer. Feels like they should have closed one investigation and maybe opened up another.

But the basic fact remains that Flynn lied to the Trump administration and FBI.

That he deserves to get off for bad process may be 100% the right call. But he is a liar and not a blameless victim.

[Jolly]

@xenon said in Nunes: Criminal Referrals Coming:

So that thread brings up the grey area here.

The first part of the thread asserts the following:

Van Grack told Judge Sullivan that the Flynn “lies” "impeded" and "had a material impact on" the Trump/Russia investigation.

Flynn was already under investigation on the whole counterintelligence thing. They were going to close up the investigation, because they found nothing material.

Then this whole Kislyak thing happens and Stzrok comments that it was “serendipitously good” and “our utter incompetence actually helps us.” - because the investigation hadn't been close. McCabe reportedly acted with “surprise and relief"

Now the DOJ's argument is that Flynn can make false statements to the FBI, that's not a crime - but there was no investigative basis for it (I'm assuming that means the original probe). That's why it needs to be thrown out.

Now - let me say. I'm no lawyer. Feels like they should have closed one investigation and maybe opened up another.

But the basic fact remains that Flynn lied to the Trump administration and FBI.

That he deserves to get off for bad process may be 100% the right call. But he is a liar and not a blameless victim.

And another basic fact is that Pence has said he would like to see Flynn back in government.

[George K]

@xenon said in Nunes: Criminal Referrals Coming:

Now the DOJ's argument is that Flynn can make false statements to the FBI, that's not a crime - but there was no investigative basis for it

That's fundamentally correct. Lying to the FBI about a crime is prosecutable. Lying to the FBI about NO crime is not.

Flynn lied to the Trump administration and FBI.

And the FBI says it can't prove it. Charges dropped.

[xenon]

Right, but guys - with all the legal technicalities out of the way (I don't necessarily disagree there).

Pence asked Flynn: did you talk to Kislyak about the sanctions. He presumably said no.

The FBI asked Flynn: did you talk to Kislyak about the sanctions. He presumably said no.

@Jolly - Pence comes across as a pretty amoral political actor if he wants Flynn back.

Flynn lying about the same thing that got him fired as the NSA indicates a pretty low-integrity guy.

So - can it be the case that both of these statements are true:

• The FBI lacked integrity in its pursuit of Flynn

• Flynn lacked integrity in his conduct as incoming NSA

[Jolly]

@xenon said in Nunes: Criminal Referrals Coming:

Right, but guys - with all the legal technicalities out of the way (I don't necessarily disagree there).

Pence asked Flynn: did you talk to Kislyak about the sanctions. He presumably said no.

The FBI asked Flynn: did you talk to Kislyak about the sanctions. He presumably said no.

@Jolly - Pence comes across as a pretty amoral political actor if he wants Flynn back.

Flynn lying about the same thing that got him fired as the NSA indicates a pretty low-integrity guy.

So - can it be the case that both of these statements are true:

• The FBI lacked integrity in its pursuit of Flynn

• Flynn lacked integrity in his conduct as incoming NSA

I'd put more emphasis on what Pence thinks, than what you do.

[xenon]

@Jolly Fine. What changed between now and when Pence got him fired. Do you know?

[Jolly]

@xenon said in Nunes: Criminal Referrals Coming:

@Jolly Fine. What changed between now and when Pence got him fired. Do you know?

Ask Pence.

[xenon]

Well - that’s likely not happening any time soon.

But here’s what he said about Flynn before his latest blurb that he thinks Flynn is great.

“What I can tell you is that I knew that he lied to me and I know the president made the right decision with regard to him.”

[Jolly]

@xenon said in Nunes: Criminal Referrals Coming:

Well - that’s likely not happening any time soon.

But here’s what he said about Flynn before his latest blurb that he thinks Flynn is great.

“What I can tell you is that I knew that he lied to me and I know the president made the right decision with regard to him.”

And the best thing Biden could say about Obama was that he was clean.

And your point is?

[xenon]

I honestly don’t know what that means. Biden’s a kook, who listens to him anyways?

[Improviso]

@xenon said in Nunes: Criminal Referrals Coming:

Biden’s a kook, who listens to him anyways?

Anyone suffering from TDS.