Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. 10,300

10,300

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
9 Posts 4 Posters 49 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Whatever your political party, election integrity is good.

    Mail-in ballots are not. Voting in precincts where you aren't supposed to vote, is not.

    https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/16/georgia-secretary-of-state-explains-why-hes-just-now-discovering-more-than-10000-illegal-votes-cast-in-2020/

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • X Offline
      X Offline
      xenon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      To be clear, this is the number of people who voted in the wrong county.

      So not as nefarious as it sounds. I can imagine people moving and still voting where they’re used to.

      Or living on the edge of a county or something.

      JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • X xenon

        To be clear, this is the number of people who voted in the wrong county.

        So not as nefarious as it sounds. I can imagine people moving and still voting where they’re used to.

        Or living on the edge of a county or something.

        JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @xenon said in 10,300:

        To be clear, this is the number of people who voted in the wrong county.

        So not as nefarious as it sounds. I can imagine people moving and still voting where they’re used to.

        Or living on the edge of a county or something.

        Well, just how pregnant are you?

        Sorry, I ain't buying it. People know that it's wrong.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        X 1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Jolly

          @xenon said in 10,300:

          To be clear, this is the number of people who voted in the wrong county.

          So not as nefarious as it sounds. I can imagine people moving and still voting where they’re used to.

          Or living on the edge of a county or something.

          Well, just how pregnant are you?

          Sorry, I ain't buying it. People know that it's wrong.

          X Offline
          X Offline
          xenon
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @jolly said in 10,300:

          @xenon said in 10,300:

          To be clear, this is the number of people who voted in the wrong county.

          So not as nefarious as it sounds. I can imagine people moving and still voting where they’re used to.

          Or living on the edge of a county or something.

          Well, just how pregnant are you?

          Sorry, I ain't buying it. People know that it's wrong.

          I thought it was something more sinister before I read the article. An easy way to check for fraud would be to see if the vote share dem/rep was significantly different for the 10000 than the rest of the counties. (I wouldn’t expect it to be)

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Sinister is not a scale in voting integrity. Either a ballot is cast correctly or it is not. There is no middle ground.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              We are obligated as citizens to make sure we participate in elections correctly. Period. To accept anything else is to invite disaster.

              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

              X 1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Mik

                We are obligated as citizens to make sure we participate in elections correctly. Period. To accept anything else is to invite disaster.

                X Offline
                X Offline
                xenon
                wrote on last edited by xenon
                #7

                @mik I’d be fine with them cancelling those votes. I’d be surprised if it’d make any difference in the results though

                I’m all for stricter voting laws - if for nothing else than to assuage some of the recent skepticism.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • AxtremusA Offline
                  AxtremusA Offline
                  Axtremus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Cleveland built her entire case using the USPS’ “change of address” data. But change of mailing address do not perfectly correspond to change of residency. Just because a person files a “change of address” form with the USPS to start forwarding mail to another address on, say, October 1st does not mean he had actually moved on October 1st. It is simply insufficient to use the USPS’ “change of address” data to imply that a vote has been cast “incorrectly”, and the law recognizes that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Does it hurt when you assume pretzel form?

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups