It's binary, Jim
-
wrote on 11 Jul 2021, 23:18 last edited by
And legal.
Link to video -
wrote on 11 Jul 2021, 23:23 last edited by
OK, as I've commented in the past, I own zero firearms. Never saw the need for them in my life (so far).
So he claims this "binary" trigger is really not "full auto."
Seems to be a distinction without a difference, much like a bump stock.
-
OK, as I've commented in the past, I own zero firearms. Never saw the need for them in my life (so far).
So he claims this "binary" trigger is really not "full auto."
Seems to be a distinction without a difference, much like a bump stock.
wrote on 11 Jul 2021, 23:25 last edited by@george-k said in It's binary, Jim:
OK, as I've commented in the past, I own zero firearms. Never saw the need for them in my life (so far).
So he claims this "binary" trigger is really not "full auto."
Seems to be a distinction without a difference, much like a bump stock.
By legal definition, there is no auto-sear. That is not an automatic weapon. But the rate of fire he achieves is better than the full-auto I used to have.
-
@george-k said in It's binary, Jim:
OK, as I've commented in the past, I own zero firearms. Never saw the need for them in my life (so far).
So he claims this "binary" trigger is really not "full auto."
Seems to be a distinction without a difference, much like a bump stock.
By legal definition, there is no auto-sear. That is not an automatic weapon. But the rate of fire he achieves is better than the full-auto I used to have.
wrote on 11 Jul 2021, 23:27 last edited by@jolly said in It's binary, Jim:
By legal definition
I get that.
The letter of the law vs the intent of the law.
-
wrote on 12 Jul 2021, 00:23 last edited by
The NFA and why it was enacted...
https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/national-firearms-act