$taffing
-
$10,000,000 more than Trump.
https://www.oann.com/report-biden-has-most-expensive-white-house-payroll-in-history/
-
You miss the good old days with Omarosa and Scaramucci on the White House payroll, and when Ivanka and Jared worked in the White House for "free"?
You miss the good old days with Omarosa and Scaramucci on the White House payroll, and when Ivanka and Jared worked in the White House for "free"?
Free is free. Trump donated his salary to charities and other causes.
I'll wait until 2024 to see if the Biden administration has cost the taxpayers less money for staffing the White House.
If you look at Jolly's link, total costs for WH staffing, year over year, are less than what's happening now.
Why do you want the taxpayers to pay $10M more?
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
You miss the good old days with Omarosa and Scaramucci on the White House payroll, and when Ivanka and Jared worked in the White House for "free"?
Free is free. Trump donated his salary to charities and other causes.
I'll wait until 2024 to see if the Biden administration has cost the taxpayers less money for staffing the White House.
If you look at Jolly's link, total costs for WH staffing, year over year, are less than what's happening now.
Why do you want the taxpayers to pay $10M more?
Why do you want the taxpayers to pay $10M more?
Because the $10M more brings good returns to the tax payers, because the $10M more avoids costly mistakes that then spare the tax payers from having to foot the bill for the consequences later.
Take the bungled COVID-19 response in first half of 2020, for example, a more competent set of White House staff could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.
-
Why do you want the taxpayers to pay $10M more?
Because the $10M more brings good returns to the tax payers, because the $10M more avoids costly mistakes that then spare the tax payers from having to foot the bill for the consequences later.
Take the bungled COVID-19 response in first half of 2020, for example, a more competent set of White House staff could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.
Why do you want the taxpayers to pay $10M more?
Take the bungled COVID-19 response in first half of 2020, for example, a more competent set of White House staff could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.
Oh no you won’t get away that easy. Governor Cuomo set Trump straight and did the best practice Covid response.
-
Why do you want the taxpayers to pay $10M more?
Because the $10M more brings good returns to the tax payers, because the $10M more avoids costly mistakes that then spare the tax payers from having to foot the bill for the consequences later.
Take the bungled COVID-19 response in first half of 2020, for example, a more competent set of White House staff could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.
Why do you want the taxpayers to pay $10M more?
Because the $10M more brings good returns to the tax payers, because the $10M more avoids costly mistakes that then spare the tax payers from having to foot the bill for the consequences later.
Take the bungled COVID-19 response in first half of 2020, for example, a more competent set of White House staff could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.
Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
You ought to take that one on the road....
-
Why do you want the taxpayers to pay $10M more?
Because the $10M more brings good returns to the tax payers, because the $10M more avoids costly mistakes that then spare the tax payers from having to foot the bill for the consequences later.
Take the bungled COVID-19 response in first half of 2020, for example, a more competent set of White House staff could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.
Because the $10M more brings good returns to the tax payers, because the $10M more avoids costly mistakes that then spare the tax payers from having to foot the bill for the consequences later.
Take the bungled COVID-19 response in first half of 2020, for example, a more competent set of White House staff could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.(Cheap) Scotch everywhere. You owe me a keyboard.
-
Because the $10M more brings good returns to the tax payers, because the $10M more avoids costly mistakes that then spare the tax payers from having to foot the bill for the consequences later.
Take the bungled COVID-19 response in first half of 2020, for example, a more competent set of White House staff could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.(Cheap) Scotch everywhere. You owe me a keyboard.
Because the $10M more brings good returns to the tax payers, because the $10M more avoids costly mistakes that then spare the tax payers from having to foot the bill for the consequences later.
Take the bungled COVID-19 response in first half of 2020, for example, a more competent set of White House staff could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.(Cheap) Scotch everywhere. You owe me a keyboard.
My favorite part was the total lack of anything in even the same hemisphere of supporting evidence.
