Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone

Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
23 Posts 5 Posters 134 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

    @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

    @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

    There's something funny about this story. A consultant doctor with a 1300 pound credit limit that's maxed out?

    My guess is the reason he's publicising this is to try and shame Apple into letting him off, just as they should.

    How is it Apple’s fault? I’m not saying it isn’t but curious as to the rationale.

    There is Apple ID for kids for example.

    They create or publish a 'free' game aimed at kids that can run up over 1000GBP in charges in the space of an hour, and this is OK?

    No, obviously, it's completely fucked up. They didn't provide anybody with 1000 pounds worth of product. They shouldn't keep the money.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Loki
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

    @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

    @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

    There's something funny about this story. A consultant doctor with a 1300 pound credit limit that's maxed out?

    My guess is the reason he's publicising this is to try and shame Apple into letting him off, just as they should.

    How is it Apple’s fault? I’m not saying it isn’t but curious as to the rationale.

    There is Apple ID for kids for example.

    They create or publish a 'free' game aimed at kids that can run up over 1000GBP in charges in the space of an hour, and this is OK?

    No, obviously, it's completely fucked up. They didn't provide anybody with 1000 pounds worth of product. They shouldn't keep the money.

    Cool. Is it their game or a third party app? Sorry I am being lazy.

    HoraceH Doctor PhibesD 2 Replies Last reply
    • L Loki

      @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

      @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

      @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

      There's something funny about this story. A consultant doctor with a 1300 pound credit limit that's maxed out?

      My guess is the reason he's publicising this is to try and shame Apple into letting him off, just as they should.

      How is it Apple’s fault? I’m not saying it isn’t but curious as to the rationale.

      There is Apple ID for kids for example.

      They create or publish a 'free' game aimed at kids that can run up over 1000GBP in charges in the space of an hour, and this is OK?

      No, obviously, it's completely fucked up. They didn't provide anybody with 1000 pounds worth of product. They shouldn't keep the money.

      Cool. Is it their game or a third party app? Sorry I am being lazy.

      HoraceH Offline
      HoraceH Offline
      Horace
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

      @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

      @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

      @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

      There's something funny about this story. A consultant doctor with a 1300 pound credit limit that's maxed out?

      My guess is the reason he's publicising this is to try and shame Apple into letting him off, just as they should.

      How is it Apple’s fault? I’m not saying it isn’t but curious as to the rationale.

      There is Apple ID for kids for example.

      They create or publish a 'free' game aimed at kids that can run up over 1000GBP in charges in the space of an hour, and this is OK?

      No, obviously, it's completely fucked up. They didn't provide anybody with 1000 pounds worth of product. They shouldn't keep the money.

      Cool. Is it their game or a third party app? Sorry I am being lazy.

      It's not their game. Apple specifically encourages parents to limit their children's screen time, and provides tools within the OS to track that. There are also parental controls regarding content. Apple is among the most socially conscious companies, and while I agree they should refund this doctor's money, they are powerless to correct his poor parenting.

      Education is extremely important.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • L Loki

        @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

        @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

        @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

        There's something funny about this story. A consultant doctor with a 1300 pound credit limit that's maxed out?

        My guess is the reason he's publicising this is to try and shame Apple into letting him off, just as they should.

        How is it Apple’s fault? I’m not saying it isn’t but curious as to the rationale.

        There is Apple ID for kids for example.

        They create or publish a 'free' game aimed at kids that can run up over 1000GBP in charges in the space of an hour, and this is OK?

        No, obviously, it's completely fucked up. They didn't provide anybody with 1000 pounds worth of product. They shouldn't keep the money.

        Cool. Is it their game or a third party app? Sorry I am being lazy.

        Doctor PhibesD Offline
        Doctor PhibesD Offline
        Doctor Phibes
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

        @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

        @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

        @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

        There's something funny about this story. A consultant doctor with a 1300 pound credit limit that's maxed out?

        My guess is the reason he's publicising this is to try and shame Apple into letting him off, just as they should.

        How is it Apple’s fault? I’m not saying it isn’t but curious as to the rationale.

        There is Apple ID for kids for example.

        They create or publish a 'free' game aimed at kids that can run up over 1000GBP in charges in the space of an hour, and this is OK?

        No, obviously, it's completely fucked up. They didn't provide anybody with 1000 pounds worth of product. They shouldn't keep the money.

        Cool. Is it their game or a third party app? Sorry I am being lazy.

        Well, it's a 3rd party app - but either Ludia or Apple ought to do something. They're both making money off of this. In fact, I think maybe Horace needs to step in.

        I was only joking

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

          @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

          @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

          @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

          @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

          There's something funny about this story. A consultant doctor with a 1300 pound credit limit that's maxed out?

          My guess is the reason he's publicising this is to try and shame Apple into letting him off, just as they should.

          How is it Apple’s fault? I’m not saying it isn’t but curious as to the rationale.

          There is Apple ID for kids for example.

          They create or publish a 'free' game aimed at kids that can run up over 1000GBP in charges in the space of an hour, and this is OK?

          No, obviously, it's completely fucked up. They didn't provide anybody with 1000 pounds worth of product. They shouldn't keep the money.

          Cool. Is it their game or a third party app? Sorry I am being lazy.

          Well, it's a 3rd party app - but either Ludia or Apple ought to do something. They're both making money off of this. In fact, I think maybe Horace needs to step in.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Loki
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

          @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

          @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

          @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

          @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

          There's something funny about this story. A consultant doctor with a 1300 pound credit limit that's maxed out?

          My guess is the reason he's publicising this is to try and shame Apple into letting him off, just as they should.

          How is it Apple’s fault? I’m not saying it isn’t but curious as to the rationale.

          There is Apple ID for kids for example.

          They create or publish a 'free' game aimed at kids that can run up over 1000GBP in charges in the space of an hour, and this is OK?

          No, obviously, it's completely fucked up. They didn't provide anybody with 1000 pounds worth of product. They shouldn't keep the money.

          Cool. Is it their game or a third party app? Sorry I am being lazy.

          Well, it's a 3rd party app - but either Ludia or Apple ought to do something. They're both making money off of this. In fact, I think maybe Horace needs to step in.

          Has anyone looked at the details? Does the app adequately warn you that you are about to spend a bunch of money?

          If I hand my phone to a 7 year old should vendors be responsible for what happens?

          Gut says screw that vendor but the father has a ton to learn.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            Free gaming apps for kids with in-app purchases is the dominant model for game apps.

            They tell you the cost before you click ok. The way normal parents deal is to make sure the kid understands he can’t do it without permission. If he’s not old enough to follow that rule, he shouldn’t use your phone.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            1 Reply Last reply
            • Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              Obviously, what the father did wasn't good, and he certainly isn't blameless, but my point is that the company didn't provide 1000 pounds of value, in fact not even 50 GBP of value, so they ought to do something.

              Apart from anything else, it's terrible PR.

              I was only joking

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              • CopperC Offline
                CopperC Offline
                Copper
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                The parent should understand that he is giving the boy access to his credit.

                Is this common that a relatively competent adult doesn't get this?

                1 Reply Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                  #17

                  I don't think it stretches the bounds of credibility that somebody would be unaware that a game rated for 4-year olds to play would ask for 100 pound purchases during the game.

                  This is a stupid kids game, not video editing software. It's highway robbery.

                  I was only joking

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                    Obviously, what the father did wasn't good, and he certainly isn't blameless, but my point is that the company didn't provide 1000 pounds of value, in fact not even 50 GBP of value, so they ought to do something.

                    Apart from anything else, it's terrible PR.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Loki
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                    Obviously, what the father did wasn't good, and he certainly isn't blameless, but my point is that the company didn't provide 1000 pounds of value, in fact not even 50 GBP of value, so they ought to do something.

                    Apart from anything else, it's terrible PR.

                    That’s a great point. Apple should make a statement and drop any vendor in their marketplace that abuses the privilege.

                    Apple has earned a ton of trust, but that has been through active acts.

                    CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
                    • L Loki

                      @doctor-phibes said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                      Obviously, what the father did wasn't good, and he certainly isn't blameless, but my point is that the company didn't provide 1000 pounds of value, in fact not even 50 GBP of value, so they ought to do something.

                      Apart from anything else, it's terrible PR.

                      That’s a great point. Apple should make a statement and drop any vendor in their marketplace that abuses the privilege.

                      Apple has earned a ton of trust, but that has been through active acts.

                      CopperC Offline
                      CopperC Offline
                      Copper
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                      Apple has earned a ton of trust

                      From what I can tell Apple is hated by it's App developers

                      Of which, I was one for 13 years up until a few weeks ago.

                      Of course I hated them, but I left because I shut down my business.

                      Apple has just doubled the amount it pays developers (who gross under $1 million per year in sales). A clear indication of their, hopefully reformed, selfish behavior.

                      HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                      • CopperC Copper

                        @loki said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                        Apple has earned a ton of trust

                        From what I can tell Apple is hated by it's App developers

                        Of which, I was one for 13 years up until a few weeks ago.

                        Of course I hated them, but I left because I shut down my business.

                        Apple has just doubled the amount it pays developers (who gross under $1 million per year in sales). A clear indication of their, hopefully reformed, selfish behavior.

                        HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        @copper said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                        From what I can tell Apple is hated by it's App developers

                        While they sell their products in a market mostly created by Apple. Sad.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        CopperC L 2 Replies Last reply
                        • HoraceH Horace

                          @copper said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                          From what I can tell Apple is hated by it's App developers

                          While they sell their products in a market mostly created by Apple. Sad.

                          CopperC Offline
                          CopperC Offline
                          Copper
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          @horace said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                          @copper said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                          From what I can tell Apple is hated by it's App developers

                          While they sell their products in a market mostly created by Apple. Sad.

                          The developers would love a different market, it’s not allowed

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • HoraceH Horace

                            @copper said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                            From what I can tell Apple is hated by it's App developers

                            While they sell their products in a market mostly created by Apple. Sad.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Loki
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            @horace said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                            @copper said in Don't give your 7-year-old an iPhone:

                            From what I can tell Apple is hated by it's App developers

                            While they sell their products in a market mostly created by Apple. Sad.

                            Exactly.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • CopperC Offline
                              CopperC Offline
                              Copper
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              Apple tortures them

                              It is slave labor

                              It is illegal restraint of trade

                              They are just plain mean

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups