@Andrea-B said:

They're even uglier in person.

Somebody near where I live has one. It's astonishingly bad looking. I've been sorely tempted to ask him what the fuck is wrong with him.

@Doctor-Phibes said:

Not all of them.

For sure.

They're even uglier in person.

@Andrea-B said:

the Teslas look a fuck-ton nicer than this Jony Ive turd.

Not all of them.

@jon-nyc said:

This is funny and all, but it also shows how much aerodynamics governs the design choices of EVs when range is a principal design goal.

Yes. Although Ferrari says that this car has the lowest CD of all their cars, it's still short of what Tesla has accomplished.

And, in my opinion, which is not too humble, the Teslas look a fuck-ton nicer than this Jony Ive turd.

@Andrea-B said:

This is funny and all, but it also shows how much aerodynamics governs the design choices of EVs when range is a principal design goal.

But it seems to me your average Ferrari buyer, insofar as they’d want an EV at all, would rather have badass deign than range.

@jon-nyc said:

Jony would say it’s butt sexy.

@Mik said:

That is one butt ugly car.

That’s your heterosexual bias showing. Jony would say it’s butt sexy.

@Horace said:

Ferrari stock down 7% today.

Yeah, but if you look at the history it went up about the same amount a week ago.

Of course, that thing is laughable. Maybe an AI designed it. Clearly, they'd be better of using actual car designers rather than that dope from Apple, although the release said he designed the interior. It's not really the interior that's the problem.